2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02892060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The additive model affected by missing completely at random in the covariate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studied regression model is Y = m(X) + σ (X) where is standard normal and m(x) is either x, or −x + x 2 , or x − 4x 2 +2x 3 suggested in Nittner (2004). As it is explained in Efromovich (1999, chap. 2), polynomials are challenging nonparametric curves for the cosine basis used by the orthogonal series estimator "nonp".…”
Section: Other Topicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The studied regression model is Y = m(X) + σ (X) where is standard normal and m(x) is either x, or −x + x 2 , or x − 4x 2 +2x 3 suggested in Nittner (2004). As it is explained in Efromovich (1999, chap. 2), polynomials are challenging nonparametric curves for the cosine basis used by the orthogonal series estimator "nonp".…”
Section: Other Topicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We begin with testing performance of the proposed in Section 2 data-driven nonparametric regression estimator (in what follows referred to as "nonp") for small samples. Apart of an imputation procedure of Nittner (2003Nittner ( , 2004, there are no nonparametric peers to compare with. As a result, the underlying idea of the study is to compare "nonp" with known parametric estimators recommended for missing data.…”
Section: Other Topicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations