2000
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-000-0149-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The adhesion strength of A lead-free solder hot-dipped on copper substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This tendency is in agreement with many previous results. 21,22 In addition, the yield strengths of those samples are in the range of 15-20 MPa, and the samples exhibited strong strain hardening during the tensile test, as shown in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Morphology and Growth Kinetics Of Interfacial Intermetallic mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This tendency is in agreement with many previous results. 21,22 In addition, the yield strengths of those samples are in the range of 15-20 MPa, and the samples exhibited strong strain hardening during the tensile test, as shown in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Morphology and Growth Kinetics Of Interfacial Intermetallic mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…When the Sn-Zn solders wet on Cu substrate, the Zn atoms would compete with Sn atoms for reaction with Cu [44,45]. Yu et al explain that the diffusivity of Sn in the Cu-Sn alloy is given by D Sn ¼ 1.9 Â 10 À10 cm 2 /s and the diffusivity of Zn in the Cu-Zn alloy is D Zn ¼ 2.7 Â 10 À10 cm 2 /s at 300 C [46]. This shows that at 300 C (molten state), the diffusivity of D Zn > D Sn and explains the formation of g-Cu 5 Zn 8 phase instead of h 0 -Cu 6 Sn 5 compound during the soldering process.…”
Section: Intermetallic Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second reason can be explained from thermodynamic point of view [46][47][48]. The Gibbs free energy of g-Cu 5 Zn 8 formation is much lower than that of h 0 -Cu 6 Sn 5 and 3-Cu 3 Sn phases, and would be more stable.…”
Section: Intermetallic Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be explained by several reasons. The first reason is that the diffusion rate of Zn in the Cu 5 Zn 8 alloy, D Zn ¼ 2.7 x10 À10 cm 2 /s, is faster compared to that of Sn in the Cu 6 Sn 5 alloy, D Sn ¼ 1.9 Â 10 À10 cm 2 /s [36]. The second reason is the Gibbs free energy of Cu 5 Zn 8 (DG ¼ À12.34 kJ/mol) formation is much lower than that of Cu 6 Sn 5, (DG ¼ À7.42 kJ/mol) and Cu 3 Sn (DG ¼ À7.78 kJ/mol) [36,37].…”
Section: Results and Dicussionmentioning
confidence: 99%