1979
DOI: 10.1017/s0003356100023448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The administration of sugar solutions to pigs immediately prior to slaughter 2. Effect on carcass yield, liver weight and muscle quality in commercial pigs

Abstract: Three field trials were undertaken to determine the influence of feeding sugar solutions to pigs immediately prior to slaughter on carcass yield, liver weight and muscle quality. In the first, which involved 168 pigs of 85 to 95 kg live weight, provision of a glucose syrup solution in lairage (4 h) followed by water (12 h), compared with water-only (16 h) increased carcass yield (3 %) and liver weight (27 %) and reduced muscle ultimate pH (0-1 to 0-4 unit). When water was not made available after consumption o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All these handling practices can induce stress, either psychologically or physically (Rosenvold & Andersen, 2003). Pre-slaughter stress is both an animal welfare issue and a quality issue, as it has long been recognized that pre-slaughter stress can adversely affect the quality of pork (Fernandes, Smith, Ellis, Clark, & Armstrong, 1979;O'Neill, Lynchb, Troy, Buckley, & Kerrya, 2003;Van de Perre, Permentier, De Bie, Verbeke, & Geers, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these handling practices can induce stress, either psychologically or physically (Rosenvold & Andersen, 2003). Pre-slaughter stress is both an animal welfare issue and a quality issue, as it has long been recognized that pre-slaughter stress can adversely affect the quality of pork (Fernandes, Smith, Ellis, Clark, & Armstrong, 1979;O'Neill, Lynchb, Troy, Buckley, & Kerrya, 2003;Van de Perre, Permentier, De Bie, Verbeke, & Geers, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was attributed by the author to an inadequate supply of feed during the holding period. However, in none of the trials conducted by Fernandes et al (1979a) and Fernandes et al (1979b), where the pigs receiving a sucrose solution were lairaged for periods of 14 to 17 h prior to slaughter, were subsequent carcass yields lower than those recorded for pigs slaughtered on arrival at the abattoir. Again, it has been shown that failure to provide bacon pigs with water for several hours after giving access to a glucose syrup solution resulted in a lower carcass yield (Fernandes et al, 1979b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, in none of the trials conducted by Fernandes et al (1979a) and Fernandes et al (1979b), where the pigs receiving a sucrose solution were lairaged for periods of 14 to 17 h prior to slaughter, were subsequent carcass yields lower than those recorded for pigs slaughtered on arrival at the abattoir. Again, it has been shown that failure to provide bacon pigs with water for several hours after giving access to a glucose syrup solution resulted in a lower carcass yield (Fernandes et al, 1979b). Although Wismer-Pedersen (1959) reported that a supply of water was available ad libitum to the pigs, water intakes were not recorded, and water was only available for 3 to 4 h after sugar feeding, a shorter period than the 12 h allowed by Fernandes et al (1979a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations