2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2017.8071093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The admissible gap (AG) method for reactive collision avoidance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The motion-related metrics include the distance D taken to achieve the final goal and the average trajectory curvature change C chg as in [30], representing the path's oscillations,…”
Section: B Performance Metrics and Simulation Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motion-related metrics include the distance D taken to achieve the final goal and the average trajectory curvature change C chg as in [30], representing the path's oscillations,…”
Section: B Performance Metrics and Simulation Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [42], a solution was presented for real-time obstacle avoidance, called Admissible Gap (AG). In the proposed solution, a gap is admissible if it is possible to find a motion command that, once executed, allows the robot to safely pass through the gap, respecting its shape and movement constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gap-based processing aimed at detecting passable free-space is compatible with and improves the synthesis of local optimal paths. While there is no widely agreed-upon representation-or processing approach-for gaps, gap-based methods typically reduce 1D laser scan measurements to a set of "gaps" comprised of beginning and terminating points that represent collisionfree regions in the observable space [24]- [28]. A gap-based method would then generate reactive motion commands towards a selected gap, which gives favorable performance in reasonably sparse and structured environments.…”
Section: A Related Work and Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%