2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Adolescent Substance Abuse Prevention Study: A randomized field trial of a universal substance abuse prevention program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
91
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings from the current study suggest that trait disinhibition should be considered when developing alcohol-use prevention and intervention programs for students with ADHD. A novel alcohol prevention program targeting the personality traits associated with substance misuse has demonstrated success among high school students (O'Leary et al, 2010;Sloboda et al, 2009). A similar program tailored to college students with ADHD whose personality profile is elevated in the domain of disinhibition or impulsivity may be beneficial for this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings from the current study suggest that trait disinhibition should be considered when developing alcohol-use prevention and intervention programs for students with ADHD. A novel alcohol prevention program targeting the personality traits associated with substance misuse has demonstrated success among high school students (O'Leary et al, 2010;Sloboda et al, 2009). A similar program tailored to college students with ADHD whose personality profile is elevated in the domain of disinhibition or impulsivity may be beneficial for this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, four studies were based on community-based intervention Edelen, Slaughter, McCaffrey, Becker, & Morral, 2010;Jones & Rossiter, 2009;Tebes et al, 2007). There were six studies that focused on schoolbased intervention (Anderson & Moore, 2009;LaBrie et al, 2009;Newton, Andrews, Teesson, & Vogl, 2009;Perry, Stigler, Arora, & Reddy, 2009;Sloboda et al, 2009;Sun, Sussman, Dent, & Rohrbach, 2008). The last category, combined interventions, covered interventions which were combined or which implemented one or more interventions at a time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There must be no significant differences between the two study groups at baseline (t1). The effects of predictors (like gender, culture and social characteristics) on the smoking behaviour after 6 months (t2) will be calculated by logistic regression analysis, a state-of-the-art technique for the evaluation of the effectiveness of prevention programmes21 24 25 in longitudinal studies. The significance level is 5% for t tests (double-sided) and 95% for CIs (double-sided).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%