The adoption of IFRS, comparability of financial statements and foreign investors’ ownership

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the indirect effect of the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) adoption in increasing the foreign investors’ ownership through the improvement of comparability of financial statements. Design/methodology/approach This study employs listed companies in 18 countries across Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia with an observation period from 2003 to 2012. Unlike previous studies, this study uses a continuous variable to measure the level of IFRS adoption which is measured at the country level. This study includes countries that do not fully adopt the IFRS, partially adopt, make some delays in adoption or some modifications to IFRS. Findings The results show that the level of IFRS adoption has a positive effect on the comparability of financial statements. The level of IFRS adoption indirectly increases the foreign investors’ ownership through the comparability of financial statements. These results are consistent with proponents for IFRS adoption which argue that the adoption improves the comparability of financial statements that in turn attracts greater cross-border investment. Research limitations/implications The findings of this study need to be interpreted with caution due to limitations. Although this research provides a detail measurement on the IFRS adoption, this study only looks at three general items of difference in adopting the IFRS. “Differences in text” used in this research has not quantified detail differences for each adopted standards. Therefore, future research can use a more in-depth measurement of the IFRS adoption level that considers differences or exceptions of accounting treatment. Practical implications The results suggest that the standards setting bodies’ (IASB) strategy on promoting the IFRS and objectives to develop a standard that leads to increase the financial statement comparability have been achieved. This research shows that the IFRS adoption plays a role in ensuring the financial statement quality in terms of its comparability. It implies that the standard-setting bodies in every country, as one of the responsible institutions regulating the business environment, can be entrusted with a greater role in order to ensure better financial information quality. Originality/value This study introduces novel measurement that is more detailed in measuring the IFRS adoption level instead of applying the discrete variable approach (“adopt” and “not adopt”) performed by previous studies (DeFond et al., 2011; Tan et al., 2011; Lee and Fargher, 2010). This study does not only cover some EU countries but also covers some countries in Asia, Africa, and Australia, so it can be better at capturing the variation of the IFRS adoption outside the EU. This broader coverage will show the consistency of the benefits of IFRS adoption. This study is most closely related to that of DeFond et al. (2011). This research extends DeFond’s study with some important differences as follows: it uses output-based and firm-specific measurement of the comparability from DeFranco et al. (2011), which is deemed to be more appropriate because it represents the qualitative characteristics of financial statements from a user’s perspective, i.e., investors, who evaluate historical performance and predict future performance in their investment decisions; it uses a broader scope of institutional investors; and it covers IFRS adoption in countries outside the EU for a longer observation period.

Digital Technologies for Competitive Analysis and Evaluation of Competitive Capacity of a Business Entity

“…Вo ssales revenue calculated for the sample in the previous period; Next, based on the values determined according to formulae (4) and (10), the competitive capacity ratio is calculated: (13) The greater the K ratio, the larger the competitive capacity of the concerned entity as compared with the sample. It is obvious that 0 < K < ∞.…”

Technology of Predictive Analysis of Entity’s Financial Stability Based on Linear Constrains

“…Ideally, such set of constraints should consist of inequalities and equations in the number at least equal to the number of unknown business transaction values. In reality, such ratio cannot always be achieved, which is another reason for using scenario-based predictive analysis with regard to the restoration of financial equilibrium [3,4,6,12,20].…”

“…of the coefficients of the asset items of the balance sheet model(1) in the canonical functionСRi f ; ) ( СRi f  -the vector of the coefficients of the liability items of the balance sheet model (1) in the canonical function product on the left side of inequality (42) is the vector of the coefficients multiplied by the values of the business transactions concerned. The coefficient multiplied by the value of the k x business transaction is ) -the k column of matrix A of the effect of business transactions on the asset side of the balance sheet model (1); k P -the k column of matrix P of the effect of business transactions on the liability side of the balance sheet model (1).For each of the six canonical criterion functions selected (12),(16),(20),(24), (28), (32), twenty coefficients on the left side of inequality (42) are calculated according to the formula (43) using the values of the vector items (13),(14),(17),(18),(21),(22),(25),(26), (29), (30), (33), (34) and matrices (9),(10).…”

Los IFRS y la armonización contable material de los inventarios de las empresas colombianas cotizantes no financieras

“…La armonización material se refiere al nivel de homogeneidad en el empleo de las mismas prácticas y tratamientos contables, en consideración de las diferentes alternativas permitidas en la regulación. Un aumento de esta puede influir positivamente en la manera como los usuarios de los estados financieros perciben la característica cualitativa de la comparabilidad entre empresas de un mismo sector y para una entidad en diferentes periodos, precisamente, una de las metas de la convergencia hacía los IFRS (Daraghma, 2018;Mita, Utama, Fitriany & Wulandari, 2018;Rico, Montoya, Franco y Laverde, 2020).…”