2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00317-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The adsorption kinetics of metal ions onto different microalgae and siliceous earth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Schmitt et al (2001) reported that S. subspicatus was able to remove a maximum of 72.06±9.59 and 9.20±9.98 mg/g biomass after exposure to 0.5 mg/L Zn 2+ and 0.3 mg/L Hg 2+ , respectively; those values were extrapolated as the asymptotic estimates of the saturation parameters in Langmuir models. Vannela and Verma (2006) reported, in turn, that the maximum Zn 2+ adsorption capacity by living cells of S. platensis was 250.3 ±26.4 mg/g biomass , when in the presence of 800 mg/L Zn 2+ .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schmitt et al (2001) reported that S. subspicatus was able to remove a maximum of 72.06±9.59 and 9.20±9.98 mg/g biomass after exposure to 0.5 mg/L Zn 2+ and 0.3 mg/L Hg 2+ , respectively; those values were extrapolated as the asymptotic estimates of the saturation parameters in Langmuir models. Vannela and Verma (2006) reported, in turn, that the maximum Zn 2+ adsorption capacity by living cells of S. platensis was 250.3 ±26.4 mg/g biomass , when in the presence of 800 mg/L Zn 2+ .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter method of uptake (denoted as 'biosorption' or 'passive uptake') occurs very fast and even in non-viable cells, whereas heavy metal uptake encompassing incorporation in the cell cytoplasm itself, after the cell membrane has been crossed (referred to as 'active uptake'), is usually slower (Cruz et al 2004;Schmitt et al 2001). Biosorption of (toxic) heavy metals by microalgae has been reported by several authors (Nacorda et al 2007;Nalimova et al 2005;Schmitt et al 2001;Senthilkumar et al 2006;Tripathi and Gaur 2006); microalgal strains originally isolated from contaminated sites are likely more tolerant, and thus exhibit a greater uptake capacity of the metals present in their original media than strains obtained from clean environments, or kept on artificial media devoid of such ecological stress. A number of resistance mechanisms can come into play in this particular; Monteiro et al (2011) have indeed proven the higher uptake ability of a microalga strain isolated from a wild consortium, Scenedesmus obliquus, relative to another strain of the same species obtained from a non-contaminated environment-which thus served as control: a much higher extent of Zn was removed (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that zinc-binding ability of the studied species is in the ''medium range'' in comparison with that of some other green algae, similarly to their zinc tolerance. There are more capable isolates: Schmitt et al (2001) claimed maximum specific adsorption capacities of 72.06 mg g -1…”
Section: Removal Of Zincmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the literature presents papers using bacteria (da Costa and Duta, 2001), algal cells (Schmitt et al 2001), fungi (McAfee et al 2001) and other biomaterials (Lister and Line, 2001;Schneider et al 2001), little is known about the behavior of a continuous system, for this kind of treatment. The purpose of the present work was to investigate the behavior of continuous serial reactors for the uptake of zinc.…”
Section: * Corresponding Authormentioning
confidence: 99%