2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2008.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The adsorption of sulfur dispersing agents on sulfur and nickel sulfide concentrate surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher recurrence of S 0 in TLR compared to in SHALR, as shown in the automated SEM analyses, indicates that there would be more elemental sulfur present in the TLR. This could be considered a potential problem for further noble metal extraction due to the tendency of elemental sulfur to coat Au and Ag particle surfaces, especially in oxidative leaching [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher recurrence of S 0 in TLR compared to in SHALR, as shown in the automated SEM analyses, indicates that there would be more elemental sulfur present in the TLR. This could be considered a potential problem for further noble metal extraction due to the tendency of elemental sulfur to coat Au and Ag particle surfaces, especially in oxidative leaching [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfur-sulfide pellets formation leads to decrease in leaching velocity [5,6]. The problem solution is surfactants usage that allows to decrease sulfide wetting by molten sulfur [7][8][9][10][11]. Due to surfactants usage residues after leaching are dispersed to optimal size and stabilized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems of response surface blocking by sulfur and pellet formation can be eliminated by addition of surfactants, which change minerals wetting characteristics and sulfur properties. Lignosulfonates and petroleum-organic reagents can be used for controlling of these phenomena [8][9][10]. However, lignosulfonate usage at leaching leads to increase zinc dust consumption at solution purification from copper, nickel, cobalt, chlorine and current efficiency going down to 75-78 % [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%