2023
DOI: 10.1108/mi-10-2022-0175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The advanced leadless leadframe package and its characteristics

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this study is to offer the advanced leadless leadframe package which achieve small form factor and high thermal and electrical performance, according to the continuous market requirement. Because of demand and trends, new package structures that can accommodate many pins (I/Os) while maintaining the excellent thermal and electrical properties of the leadframe package was studied. Different from conventional leadframe and laminate packages, it must have the large-exposed pad for thermal d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across the 14 participant subgroups examined, a majority of participants who perceived (or leaned toward perceiving) gender of ChatGPT to be either male or female (N = 1,289) perceived it to be male (n = 915; 71%). The weighted mean percentage (of those perceiving ChatGPT as male) estimated using the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) method and random effects approach was 74%, with its 95% CI = [65%, 81%] excluding 50% (Kim 2023;Schwarzer & Rücker, 2022;Viechtbauer, 2010). Thus, across all our studies-where we manipulated salience of ChatGPT's different capabilities, amount of information on ChatGPT (minimal vs. video stimuli), and elicitation method (e.g., various scales or asking to name ChatGPT)-participants were more likely to perceive ChatGPT to be male than female.…”
Section: Internal Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across the 14 participant subgroups examined, a majority of participants who perceived (or leaned toward perceiving) gender of ChatGPT to be either male or female (N = 1,289) perceived it to be male (n = 915; 71%). The weighted mean percentage (of those perceiving ChatGPT as male) estimated using the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) method and random effects approach was 74%, with its 95% CI = [65%, 81%] excluding 50% (Kim 2023;Schwarzer & Rücker, 2022;Viechtbauer, 2010). Thus, across all our studies-where we manipulated salience of ChatGPT's different capabilities, amount of information on ChatGPT (minimal vs. video stimuli), and elicitation method (e.g., various scales or asking to name ChatGPT)-participants were more likely to perceive ChatGPT to be male than female.…”
Section: Internal Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%