The Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Row House Policy in Tamansari, Bandung City

Abstract

Conflicts between Governance actors are rife in the era of democracy as it is today. The purpose of this study is to analyze the problems of land conflicts faced by the community against the Bandung City Government which is in a joint coalition with PT Sartonia Agung. Those two parties had a dispute over land rights in RW 11 Tamansari to control the basis of rights for housing and the construction of Row House. The struggle of each party in the struggle for land in RW 11 Tamansari was carried out through an advocacy process with both formal and informal approaches. The Advocacy Coalition Framework in this study was used as a knife for analyzing the phenomena that occurred. The research methods used in this study were qualitative research by standing on the interpretative paradigm. The data were collected by conducting observations, in-depth interviews, and documentation relating to the outline of the research. The findings obtained from this study indicated that there was a formation of strong coalition domination by the government through aggressive and repressive behavior that raised a conflict of interest in the row house construction policy in Tamansari Subdistrict, Bandung City, which was rejected by the Coalition of the Tamansari community that was formed. The series of advocacy carried out by the Tamansari community coalition had not produced results in favor of the coalition that urged a change in the policy.

Implementation Of Public Housing Management Policy: A Case Study In Rusunawa Of Cimahi, West Java, Indonesia

“…This research employs a qualitative approach, specifically a case study methodology (Creswell & Poth, 2018;Yin, 2016). The choice of this approach is motivated by its ability to thoroughly explore, investigate, and uncover the underlying meaning of rental house management by incorporating various sources of data and presenting it through detailed descriptions of the cases and their respective themes.…”

“…The interview technique involved engaging with individuals who were directly or indirectly involved in the implementation of Rusunawa management policies in Cimahi City, including the management department (DPKP Cimahi City) and the UPT Rusunawa. To ensure the credibility of the obtained data, the researcher followed several steps, including those outlined by Yin (2016): 1) Trust: The researcher established trust by expanding the research through field observations, fostering mutual trust between the researcher and the participants; 2) Triangulation. The researcher employed data triangulation, crossreferencing information obtained from interviews, direct observations, and relevant documents to validate and complement the research findings; and 3) Validity.…”

Jejaring Aktor Dalam Upaya Perubahan Kebijakan: Kasus Advokasi Kebijakan Dalam Menolak Izin Lingkungan Pengolahan Limbah Berbahaya dan Beracun

“…Konflik antar aktor governance di negara berkembang seperti Indonesia marak terjadi, hal ini sebagaimana penelitian yang pernah dilakukan oleh (Suharto, Botha, Haryanti, & Wahyunengseh, 2018) yang dalam penelitiannya menemukan adanya sebuah marginalisasi masyarakat di wilayah Watu Ata Nusa Tenggara Timur akibat adanya sebuah kebijakan yang dikeluarkan oleh Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. Kedua, penelitian yang dilakukan oleh (Ramadhan, 2020) menemukan sebuah advokasi yang dilakukan oleh masyarakat Taman Sari Kota Bandung dalam menolak kebijakan penggusuran di wilayah mereka untuk pembangunan rumah deret dari program Pemerintah Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat. Selanjutnya, penelitian ketiga adalah penelitian yang dilakukan oleh (Anggraini, Maksum, & Halidin, 2019) yang dalam penelitiannya menemukan sebuah model konflik organisasi dalam mengelola sebuah pembangunan ekonomi yang bersifat lokal bagi masyarakat asli Papua.…”

Actor-Network Theory in Policy Change of Environmental Permit Policy for the Construction of a Cement Factory in Pati, Indonesia

“…People in the region are being marginalized as a result of a policy issued by the government (Suharto, Botha, Haryanti, & Wahyunengseh, 2018). The existence of this conflict reveals how society is the main protagonist in the struggle for solidarity that gave rise to a network of actors (Ramadhan, 2020;Wilson & Mutersbaugh, 2020). The organizational conflict model manages the local economic development of the community (Anggraini, Maksum, & Halidin, 2019).…”