2012
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The AEO, an Ontology of Anatomical Entities for Classifying Animal Tissues and Organs

Abstract: This paper describes the AEO, an ontology of anatomical entities that expands the common anatomy reference ontology (CARO) and whose major novel feature is a type hierarchy of ~160 anatomical terms. The breadth of the AEO is wider than CARO as it includes both developmental and gender-specific classes, while the granularity of the AEO terms is at a level adequate to classify simple-tissues (~70 classes) characterized by their containing a predominantly single cell-type. For convenience and to facilitate intero… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the relatively few terms that CARO includes are of limited use if one wishes to capture something of the richness of anatomy. The solution adopted here has been to use the Anatomical Entity Ontology or AEO (Bard, ), a substantial expansion of CARO that includes, for example, ~ 80 simple tissues (those containing a single cell type) and a wide variety of immaterial AEs (e.g. pits, rows, lumens, cavities) rather than the four (based on dimension: point, line, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the relatively few terms that CARO includes are of limited use if one wishes to capture something of the richness of anatomy. The solution adopted here has been to use the Anatomical Entity Ontology or AEO (Bard, ), a substantial expansion of CARO that includes, for example, ~ 80 simple tissues (those containing a single cell type) and a wide variety of immaterial AEs (e.g. pits, rows, lumens, cavities) rather than the four (based on dimension: point, line, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2010 ), ProteinOntology(PRO) (Natale et al. 2016 ), Anatomical Entity Ontology (AEO) (Bard 2012 ), Phenotype And Trait Ontology (PATO) ( http://obofoundry.org/ontology/pato.html ), Cell Ontology (CL) (Diehl et al. 2016 ), Cell Line Ontology (CLO) (Sarntivijai et al.…”
Section: The Netme Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 2010 ) is a structured controlled vocabulary for the source of an enzyme comprising tissues, cell lines, cell types and cell cultures. Anatomical Entity Ontology (AEO) Bard ( 2012 ) is an ontology of anatomical structures that expands CARO, the Common Anatomy Reference Ontology, to about 160 classes using the is_a relationship; it thus provides a detailed type classification for tissues. The AEO is useful in increasing the amount of knowledge in anatomy ontology, facilitating annotation and enabling interoperability across anatomy ontology.…”
Section: The Netme Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many such ontologies already exist, including the model-system specific C. elegans gross anatomy (WBBT), 7 the Drosophila gross anatomy (FBbt and FBdv), also referred to as the Drosophila anatomy ontology (DAO), 8 the Mouse Adult Gross Anatomy (MA), 9 Xenopus anatomy and development (XAO), 10 and Zebrafish anatomy and development (ZFA and ZFS). 11 There are also the more general Anatomical Entity Ontology (AEO), 12 Biological Spatial Ontology (BSPO), 13 and the general vertebrate “Uber-anatomy” ontology (UBERON) 14 currently (20170415) containing 15 036 anatomical terms. The zebrafish ZFA and ZFS ontologies contain 3175 anatomical terms (20170627 release) and the mouse MA 3257 terms (20170207 version).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%