People differ in their responsiveness to aesthetic experiences. It is important to understand the role of culture in such individual differences, yet existing tools for assessing aesthetic responsiveness largely focus on North American and European cultures. We created a Persian translated and culturally adapted version of the Aesthetic Responsiveness Assessment (AReA) and evaluated its psychometric properties. Construct and internal validity were evaluated in a sample of 1586 participants. Moreover, convergent and divergent validity were investigated using the Behavioral Avoidance/Inhibition Scales (BIS-BAS), Big Five Inventory-2, Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire (BMRQ), and the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS). Further, the test-retest reliability of AReA was examined for the first time in a subsample of participants (n = 160) who answered the questionnaire again after 6 months. In addition to an acceptable structural validity (CFI = .905), the Persian version of AReA showed good internal validity. Cronbach’s alpha for the overall score was .848 and varied between .64 and .81 for subscales. Concerning convergent and divergent validity, AReA subscales were positively correlated with subscales of TEPS, the Emotion Evocation subscale of BMRQ, Behavioral Avoidance and Openness, and were unrelated to Behavioral Inhibition, Conscientiousness, and Negative Emotionality. Moreover, AReA subscales showed different patterns of correlations with other questionnaires. Finally, all subscales of AReA showed high test-retest reliability, ranging from .715 to .778. Our results confirm the validity of the Persian version of AReA and thus provide a new measure of aesthetic responsiveness, useful in Persian-speaking communities, which facilitates cross-cultural research in empirical aesthetics.