The Aesthetic Unit Principle of Facial Aging

Abstract

IMPORTANCEIn youth, facial aesthetic units flow together without perceptible division. The face appears as a single dynamic structure with a smooth contour and very little if any shadowing between different anatomical regions. As one ages, facial aesthetic units slowly become distinct. This process may be a consequence of differences in skin thickness, composition of subcutaneous tissue, contour of the facial skeleton, and location of facial ligaments. Although the impact of aesthetic unit separation is clinically apparent, its fundamental role in perceived facial aging has not yet been defined empirically.OBJECTIVES To evaluate and define the effect of aesthetic unit separation on facial aging and to empirically validate the rationale for the blending of aesthetic units as a principle for facial rejuvenation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSWe prepared the photographs of 7 women for experimental evaluation of the presence or absence of facial aesthetic unit separation. Photographic stimuli were then presented to 24 naive observers in a blinded paired comparison. For each stimulus pair, observers were asked to select the facial photograph that they considered to be more youthful in appearance. Each stimulus was compared with all others. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESWe calculated a preference score for the total number of times any photograph was chosen to be more youthful compared with all others. Paired t tests were used to compare the preference scores between the facial stimuli with and without aesthetic unit separation. RESULTSWe generated 4032 responses for analysis. Photographs without facial aesthetic unit separation were consistently judged to be more youthful than their aged original or modified counterparts, with mean preference scores of 0.66 and 0.33, respectively (P Յ .047). When we selected the paired stimulus that directly compared one photograph with aesthetic unit separation with another with blended aesthetic units (2015 pairs), observers indicated that the photograph with the blended aesthetic unit was younger 95% of the time. Within-rater reliability was found to be very good (r = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEOur data support the hypothesis that facial aesthetic unit separation influences perceived facial youthfulness among photographs of women. The presence of facial aesthetic unit separation results in a less youthful appearance. Based on these empirical data, the concept of facial aesthetic unit separation appears to play a significant role in perceived facial aging.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE NA.

Blefaroplastía superior con técnica de realce de volumen: descripción de la técnica quirúrgica y sus beneficios

“…Las principales unidades estéticas de la cara son la frente, párpados, nariz, mejillas, y mentón. Cada una de estas unidades se puede subdividir en subunidades estéticas faciales 11 .…”

Assessment of practice efficacy by retrospective analysis of long‐term patient outcomes: A proposed method

“…The rating of photographic pairs by naïve graders to achieve scientific ends has been tried successfully by others. Tan, et al used naïve graders to examine the effect of aesthetic unit separation on perceived facial aging as a method to empirically validate the concept of aesthetic unit blending as a principle for facial rejuvenation. A 2012 study by Chauhan et al used pairs of frontal view photographs, one before surgery and one taken 6 months after, rated by randomly selected first‐year medical students.…”

Types of hairline recession in androgenetic alopecia and perceptions of aging in Asian males

“…Many aging studies mainly focus on facial aging, such as facial shape characteristics, visible facial skin conditions, including the formation of lines and wrinkles, variable skin pigmentation, and discontinuity of the facial region. [1][2][3][4][5] During aging, hair can also have significant changes, like turning gray and thin, and balding may happen. All the above aging changes will have a huge impact on the perception of facial age, which is also known as perceived facial age (PFA), an indicator of facial aging through external perceptional assessment.…”