2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Aethalometer calibration and determination of iron concentration in dust aerosols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
40
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…generalizable because it is sensitive to details of the environment and measurement framework. To begin with, the total iron content obtained from XRF (IMPROVE) or Neutron Activation (Fialho et al 2006) analyses is an imperfect indicator of the specific minerals that absorb. Absorption is sensitive to iron's oxidation state and other distinctions seldom analyzed in PM 2.5 samples (Lafon et al 2006), and to the physical dispersal of the absorbing minerals in the rest of the dust matrix (Sokolik and Toon 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…generalizable because it is sensitive to details of the environment and measurement framework. To begin with, the total iron content obtained from XRF (IMPROVE) or Neutron Activation (Fialho et al 2006) analyses is an imperfect indicator of the specific minerals that absorb. Absorption is sensitive to iron's oxidation state and other distinctions seldom analyzed in PM 2.5 samples (Lafon et al 2006), and to the physical dispersal of the absorbing minerals in the rest of the dust matrix (Sokolik and Toon 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PTFE sample filter is analyzed for absorption by HIPS as described above, as well as for mass by weighing and elemental composition by X-ray fluorescence (XRF). The XRF element most relevant to our analysis is iron (Fe), which is reliably measured (Hyslop et al 2012(Hyslop et al , 2015 and serves as a tracer both for mineral dusts in general (Hand et al 2016) and for absorbing dusts in particular (Fialho et al 2006;Moosmuller et al 2012). The total Fe measured by XRF is not limited to the (hydr)oxides believed responsible for absorption (Lafon et al 2006;Journet et al 2014;Utry et al 2015), but includes structural Fe in nonabsorbing clays.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with other optical measurement techniques such as nephelometry (Anderson et al 1996;Varma et al 2003;AbuRahmah et al 2006;Bond et al 2009;Massoli et al 2009) aethalometry (Hansen et al 1984;Weingartner et al 2003;Fialho et al 2006;Lack et al 2008) and photoacoustic spectroscopy (Arnott et al 1999Raspet et al 2003), there have been few studies of the instrumental limitations that can compromise the accuracy of aerosol optical properties retrieved by A-CRDS. Baynard and co-workers (2007) determined an absolute uncertainty in the measured aerosol extinction coefficient of <1% when including factors such as aerosol transmission efficiency, gas-phase interference, evaporation of volatile compounds and determination of aerosol sample volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Fialho et al (2005) differentiated the absorption spectral dependence of dust and BC measured by an aethalometer. In a subsequent study, Fialho et al (2006) calibrated these measurements with Fe on the filters, and derived empirical calibration constants for the determination of the iron concentration from the aethalometer observations. Koven and Fung (2006) employed a similar concept of absorption spectral dependence for the characterization of dust composition; however, they studied sun/sky radiometer measurements through the whole atmospheric column (AERONET) and incorporated the mineralogical effects by using different modeled relative fractions of hematite, silicate and BC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%