2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-023-09793-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Affordability Solution: a Systematic Review of Open Educational Resources

Amber M. Mullens,
Bobby Hoffman
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other end of the continuum, due to the open educational resource (OER) movement (see Mullens & Hoffman, 2023, for an overview), several federal platforms exist that provide current and freely available instructional materials that could function as role models and examples for teacher educators, teachers and students (e.g., Academic Materials; Florida Postsecondary Academic Library Network, sesam@lmz). However, although OER may provide a sensible infrastructure for the dissemination of evidence-based practices, the quality as well as the consideration of empirical evidence within the published learning materials may vary greatly among the learning materials (Mullens & Hoffman, 2023). One reason for this observation may be that OERs are produced by practitioners for practitioners with little to no measures of quality assurance.…”
Section: Realizing Educational Outreach To Transfer Scientific Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other end of the continuum, due to the open educational resource (OER) movement (see Mullens & Hoffman, 2023, for an overview), several federal platforms exist that provide current and freely available instructional materials that could function as role models and examples for teacher educators, teachers and students (e.g., Academic Materials; Florida Postsecondary Academic Library Network, sesam@lmz). However, although OER may provide a sensible infrastructure for the dissemination of evidence-based practices, the quality as well as the consideration of empirical evidence within the published learning materials may vary greatly among the learning materials (Mullens & Hoffman, 2023). One reason for this observation may be that OERs are produced by practitioners for practitioners with little to no measures of quality assurance.…”
Section: Realizing Educational Outreach To Transfer Scientific Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small percentage of students reported negative impacts associated with the ZCCM course, while most students noticed a positive or neutral effect, as summarized in Table 3. In their systematic review, Mullens and Hoffman (2023) note six studies that found an increase in student engagement. The authors caution that engagement is not well defined through self-reported measurements but stipulate that access to materials and interactive features of OER could be driving engagement.…”
Section: Student Use and Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Resources (OER) are becoming more prevalent as scientists and educators attempt to make information more accessible. Studies have shown that OERs, which users have full access to without fees, do not diminish learning, and for some people improve learning outcomes (reviewed in Mullens & Hoffman, 2023). In fact, my university, which has 79% of students on federally-funded Pell Grants, 1 now requires faculty to use OERs (specifically no-cost or low-cost textbooks) whenever possible.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%