2016
DOI: 10.1089/pop.2015.0076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Affordable Care Act and the Burden of High Cost Sharing and Utilization Management Restrictions on Access to HIV Medications for People Living with HIV/AIDS

Abstract: The HIV/AIDS epidemic continues to be a critical public health issue in the United States, where an estimated 1.2 million individuals live with HIV infection. Viral suppression is one of the primary public health goals for People Living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). A crucial component of this goal involves adequate access to health care, specifically anti-retroviral HIV medications. The enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010 raised hopes for millions of PLWHA without access to health care coverage. High … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, while diversion in context of a peer network may have positive social effects (eg increased social capital or cohesion) that support adherence, diversion in an impersonal commercial market through illicit pill brokers likely would not have such effects. Finally, in a context like the U.S. where cost is a significant barrier to HIV treatment access, 57 it may be more difficult to replace shared pills-leading to greater likelihood of a negative impact of sharing on treatment adherence-than in a setting like South Africa where ART is available at clinics free of charge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, while diversion in context of a peer network may have positive social effects (eg increased social capital or cohesion) that support adherence, diversion in an impersonal commercial market through illicit pill brokers likely would not have such effects. Finally, in a context like the U.S. where cost is a significant barrier to HIV treatment access, 57 it may be more difficult to replace shared pills-leading to greater likelihood of a negative impact of sharing on treatment adherence-than in a setting like South Africa where ART is available at clinics free of charge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The United States has the highest antiretroviral treatment (ART) prices yet the lowest rate of HIV viral suppression (54%) compared with all other well-resourced countries, including Britain, Australia, and Canada . High ART costs are among many structural barriers that lead to poor treatment access and adherence, contributing to suboptimal HIV outcomes in the United States . We sought to characterize costs of recommended initial ART regimens in the United States from 2012 to 2018 and the magnitude of cost changes over time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, in this era of increasing consciousness of health care costs, familiarity with the costeffectiveness of various therapeutic strategies is increasingly important not just for payers, institutions, and physicians, but for patients as well, as out-of-pocket payments and deductibles are increasingly significant. 32,33 As there is no definitive consensus on optimal strategies for preventing FS, nor an agreement that using a graft is necessary, our primary objectives included evaluating whether any incremental cost-effectiveness of using these two widespread methods were below WTP thresholds, and thus appropriate for usage. Our decision tree looked at this parameter at 1-to 4-year follow-up, and we noted that the FFG had ICER below most acceptable WTP thresholds versus acellular dermis, which was above the threshold and thus not recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%