2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1440-2440(01)80032-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The AFL penetrometer study: Work in progress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in agreement with Canaway and Baker who found moisture content to be the dominant factor controlling surface hardness, and with Orchard, who concluded that natural surface hardness decreases as moisture content increases [23,28].…”
Section: Discussion Of Normal Impact Test Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is in agreement with Canaway and Baker who found moisture content to be the dominant factor controlling surface hardness, and with Orchard, who concluded that natural surface hardness decreases as moisture content increases [23,28].…”
Section: Discussion Of Normal Impact Test Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although advances in understanding the behaviour of natural turf systems have been made [31,32], the high number of variables makes understanding the effects of an individual variable on player traction difficult. Orchard hypothesised a relationship model between surface traction, surface hardness, ground conditions and stud length which states that surface hardness and shoe-surface traction decrease with increasing soil moisture content [28]. This is in agreement with Canaway and Baker who concluded that moisture content is the dominant factor controlling surface hardness in natural sand-based soccer surfaces [23].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mechanical properties of the impact interface have been found to influence player injury risk, for example, a greater incidence of overuse injuries has been found while running in harder shoes and on harder surfaces (Andreasson & Olofsson, 1983). A harder surface can lead to damage of the cartilage (Orchard, 2001) whereas a too compliant surface can lead to early leg-muscle fatigue (Millet et al, 2006). There is some research evidence that increased ground reaction forces (levels of impact and rates of loading) and altered joint movement patterns (kinematics) yielded when performing on harder surfaces can cause overuse injury (James et al, 1978;Nigg et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify shoe-surface interactions mechanical tests are often used to manipulate outsoles across surfaces; ranging from penetrometers to motor-driven traction test devices [5][6][7][8][9]. Traditionally two types of mechanical tests are used to assess traction: (1) measuring the translational traction by pulling a studded shoe or plate across a surface and recording the resistance to motion, or (2) determining the rotational traction by measuring the torque required to rotate a shoe or plate when in contact with a surface.…”
Section: Page 2 Of 17mentioning
confidence: 99%