2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The AFLOW standard for high-throughput materials science calculations

Abstract: The Automatic-Flow (AFLOW) standard for the high-throughput construction of materials science electronic structure databases is described. Electronic structure calculations of solid state materials depend on a large number of parameters which must be understood by researchers, and must be reported by originators to ensure reproducibility and enable collaborative database expansion. We therefore describe standard parameter values for k-point grid density, basis set plane wave kinetic energy cut-off, exchange-co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
281
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 307 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(55 reference statements)
2
281
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All structures are fully relaxed using the automated framework AFLOW [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and the VASP package. 113 Optimizations are performed following the AFLOW standards.…”
Section: Geometry Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All structures are fully relaxed using the automated framework AFLOW [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and the VASP package. 113 Optimizations are performed following the AFLOW standards.…”
Section: Geometry Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…113 Optimizations are performed following the AFLOW standards. 34 The PAW potentials 114 are used and the exchange and correlation functionals parameterized by the generalized gradient approximation proposed by Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE). 115 All calculations use a high-energy cut-off, which is 40% larger than the maximum recommended cut-off among all component potentials, and a k-point mesh of 8000 k-points per reciprocal atom.…”
Section: Geometry Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the localized 3d electrons in the row four elements, the orbital-dependent, Coulomb potential was included in the calculations using the DFTþ Hubbard U formalism in the simplified, rotationally invariant approach introduced by Dudarev et al 29 The U values used were 2.9, 5, 5.1, 4.5, and 7.5 for Sc, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn, respectively. 30 A cut-off energy for the plane wave basis was set to 560 eV, and convergence was assumed when the energy difference between two consecutive self-consistent cycles was less than 10 À4 eV. For small binary and mixed oxide systems (8 atoms/cell, NaCl structure), the Brillouin-zone was sampled by a C-centered, 16 Â 16 Â 16 k-mesh, while only the C point was used for the larger cells.…”
Section: Density Functional Theory Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, our results suggest that among the available approximations for the system-averaged exchange-hole, the meta-GGA performs best and could be used in evaluating distances for systems widely different in size and level of inhomogeneity. Our x-hole metric could also help guiding high-throughput materials design [22], e.g., for searching in large configurational spaces or for validating the reproducibility of a collaborative database of electronic calculations, independently from the different methodology, quantum package, or hardware used [23]. Natural metrics such as this or the one for the particle density [4] might also be used to ensure that newly developed functionals optimize, together with the total energies, other key physical quantities, helping revert the trend recently described in [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%