“…A discourse, also referred to earlier, draws from the Foucauldian meaning of the word, in that it is a means of constituting knowledge, together with the social practices, forms of subjectivity and power relations which inhere in such knowledges and relations between them (Foucault, 1980). A discourse of nepotism, or favouring individuals with similar political or social affiliations, can also be construed as corruption, for example, in SA, cadre deployment of District Subject Advisers, by certain unions (the deployment of union members in key positions in order for that union to attain power within the system), has had a negative impact; not only on negative perceptions of appointment processes, but also equally on teacher skills and credibility of advisers more generally (Franks, 2014;Twala, 2014). Some deployments of this type are offered to people who lack the requisite skills to perform their role and end up advising teachers who effectively know more than they do.…”