2005
DOI: 10.1038/nature04189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The afterglow of GRB 050709 and the nature of the short-hard γ-ray bursts

Abstract: The final chapter in the long-standing mystery of the gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) centres on the origin of the short-hard class of bursts, which are suspected on theoretical grounds to result from the coalescence of neutron-star or black-hole binary systems. Numerous searches for the afterglows of short-hard bursts have been made, galvanized by the revolution in our understanding of long-duration GRBs that followed the discovery in 1997 of their broadband (X-ray, optical and radio) afterglow emission. Here we pres… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

22
504
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 489 publications
(529 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
22
504
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While for long GRBs the stellar envelopes of the progenitor are expected to drive the release of energy into fairly highly collimated jets, numerical simulations of coalescing binary systems, that are thought to be among the progenitors of short bursts, predict a lower degree of collimation. Short burst jet opening angles estimated so far were obtained for GRB 051221A, angle of ∼4-8 degrees Soderberg et al 2006) based on multiwavelength observations (from radio to X-rays) and for GRB 050709, based however on few data points that provided a poorly constrained jet angle of about ∼15 degrees (Fox et al 2005; but see also Watson et al 2006). For GRB 050724, a jet angle of ∼8-12 degree was claimed from radio and NIR observations (Berger et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While for long GRBs the stellar envelopes of the progenitor are expected to drive the release of energy into fairly highly collimated jets, numerical simulations of coalescing binary systems, that are thought to be among the progenitors of short bursts, predict a lower degree of collimation. Short burst jet opening angles estimated so far were obtained for GRB 051221A, angle of ∼4-8 degrees Soderberg et al 2006) based on multiwavelength observations (from radio to X-rays) and for GRB 050709, based however on few data points that provided a poorly constrained jet angle of about ∼15 degrees (Fox et al 2005; but see also Watson et al 2006). For GRB 050724, a jet angle of ∼8-12 degree was claimed from radio and NIR observations (Berger et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Fox et al 2005). Five short GRBs with no clear host galaxy association, but for which galaxies were detected within the XRT error circle, were claimed to reside at redshift above 0.7 and for these sources E iso ranges between 10 50 -10 52 erg (Berger et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for a powerful GRB to be produced, these stars must be extremely small and dense, and these systems are probably rare. Following the successful detection of an X-ray afterglow from the short GRB 050509B came the detection of an optical afterglow for the short GRB 050709 (Fox et al 2005;Hjorth et al 2005b). The subarcsecond position of the optical afterglow led to successful identification of the host galaxy, lying at a distance zZ0.16.…”
Section: The Discovery Of Short Burst Afterglowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short GRBs are understood to be produced by highly -relativistic jets ejected during different processes, such as neutron star -neutron star (NS-NS) or black hole -neutron star (BH-NS) binary mergers (Narayan et al 1992;Fox et al 2005;Metzger et al 2008), whose averaged redshift distribution, in the Swift-era, seems to be z ∼ 1.0 (see e.g., Magliocchetti et al 2003;Tanvir et al 2005;and Ghirlanda et al 2006). Swift and HETE-2 observations have provided evidence of clear similarities with the afterglows detected in the correspondence of long GRBs, because of the detection of X-ray and optical afterglows (Soderberg 2006;Grupe 2006;Berger 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%