2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-017-9667-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The aftershock sequence of the 5 August 2014 Orkney earthquake (ML 5.5), South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of the specific transient stress change that brings a fault to failure, the resulting rupture mechanism will however be consistent with the regional tectonic stress field as was observed in many other studies (e.g. Manzunzu et al 2017;Midzi et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regardless of the specific transient stress change that brings a fault to failure, the resulting rupture mechanism will however be consistent with the regional tectonic stress field as was observed in many other studies (e.g. Manzunzu et al 2017;Midzi et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The current seismic swarm may be either a result of stress transfer within a set of faults that are rupturing in response to heterogeneous stress fields or the presence of pre-existing crustal weaknesses within which deformation is localised and possibly triggered by loading, unloading or non-tectonic sources (e.g. Calais et al 2016;Manzunzu et al 2017). This can accommodate localised seismic swarms as seen to occur in the region.…”
Section: Seismotectonic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 2014 Orkney earthquake (M5.5) occurred on 5 August 2014 below the Moab Khotsong gold mine near Orkney, southwest of Johannesburg, South Africa (Figure 1a; Midzi et al., 2015). The mainshock and aftershocks were clearly recorded at the surface by strong‐motion meters operated by the South African Council for Geoscience (Manzunzu et al., 2017; Midzi et al., 2015) and by in‐mine geophones and strainmeters (Ogasawara et al., 2017, 2019). Analysis of the seismograms revealed that the hypocenter was 4.7 km below the surface and identified a distinct NNW–SSE striking vertical planar aftershock cloud 3.5–7.0 km below the ground surface (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This national network was enhanced with 15 strong motion meters within a radius of 25 km in the Klerksdorp district, which could record the Orkney M5.5 earthquake on 5 August 2014, and the aftershocks, Midzi et al (2015). Together with the strong motion data, 46 in-mine seismic sensors, mainly geophones, installed at depths of 2 km -3 km at distances of 3 km -8 km from the M5.5 hypocentre, allowed detailed investigation of the event (Moyer et al (2017) , Imanishi et al (2017), Mori et al (2018) and Manzunzu et al (2017), Figure 2). This M5.5 earthquake was atypical because the mechanism was strike-slip faulting instead of typical normal-faulting, and it took place at a depth significantly greater than the mining horizons in a normal-faulting stress regime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%