1929
DOI: 10.1086/623643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Age and Nomenclature of the Rome ("Watauga") Formation of the Appalachian Valley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1960
1960
1960
1960

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Rome formation was named for Rome, Ga. (Hayes, 1891, p. 143;Walcott, 1891, p. 304). This name is generally used in the southern Appalachians south of Roanoke, Va., for the dominantly red, argillaceous and sandy rocks of the upper part of the Lower Cambrian series, and has supplanted many local names that had come into use for the same unit (Woodward, 1929;Resser, 1938, p. 7-10). Keith, in his earlier work, failed to recognize the resemblance between the red shale along the southeast edge of the Appalachian Valley and the Rome formation that he mapped farther northwest; he referred to the shale as the "shore deposit of the Knox dolomite" (1892, 1895) on the mistaken assumption that the underlying Shady was equivalent to the much younger Knox.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rome formation was named for Rome, Ga. (Hayes, 1891, p. 143;Walcott, 1891, p. 304). This name is generally used in the southern Appalachians south of Roanoke, Va., for the dominantly red, argillaceous and sandy rocks of the upper part of the Lower Cambrian series, and has supplanted many local names that had come into use for the same unit (Woodward, 1929;Resser, 1938, p. 7-10). Keith, in his earlier work, failed to recognize the resemblance between the red shale along the southeast edge of the Appalachian Valley and the Rome formation that he mapped farther northwest; he referred to the shale as the "shore deposit of the Knox dolomite" (1892, 1895) on the mistaken assumption that the underlying Shady was equivalent to the much younger Knox.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%