2023
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ages of Galactic Bulge Stars with Realistic Uncertainties

Abstract: Using modern isochrones with customized physics and carefully considered statistical techniques, we recompute the age distribution for a sample of 91 microlensed dwarfs in the Galactic bulge presented by Bensby et al. and do not produce an age distribution consistent with their results. In particular, our analysis finds that only 15 of 91 stars have ages younger than 7 Gyr, compared to their finding of 42 young stars in the same sample. While we do not find a constituency of very young stars, our results do su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Eri IIʼs formation epoch (∼13.5 Gyr) is older than the age of an EDE universe. Though multiple stellar models (and CMD fitting techniques) find a consistently old age for Eri II, additional uncertainties in stellar physics (e.g., convection) may also need to be considered in determining absolute ages (e.g., Chaboyer et al 1996Chaboyer et al , 2017O'Malley et al 2017;Joyce et al 2023). Alternatively, since virtually all known UFDs around the MW appear to be older than ∼13 Gyr (e.g., Weisz et al 2014a;Brown et al 2014;Sacchi et al 2021), it may indicate that physics-based solutions to the Hubble tension resulting in ages younger than ∼13 Gyr may not be consistent with all available measurements of the universeʼs age.…”
Section: The Age Of Eri II In a Cosmological Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Eri IIʼs formation epoch (∼13.5 Gyr) is older than the age of an EDE universe. Though multiple stellar models (and CMD fitting techniques) find a consistently old age for Eri II, additional uncertainties in stellar physics (e.g., convection) may also need to be considered in determining absolute ages (e.g., Chaboyer et al 1996Chaboyer et al , 2017O'Malley et al 2017;Joyce et al 2023). Alternatively, since virtually all known UFDs around the MW appear to be older than ∼13 Gyr (e.g., Weisz et al 2014a;Brown et al 2014;Sacchi et al 2021), it may indicate that physics-based solutions to the Hubble tension resulting in ages younger than ∼13 Gyr may not be consistent with all available measurements of the universeʼs age.…”
Section: The Age Of Eri II In a Cosmological Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isochrones were transformed from theoretical coordinates to the appropriate bandpasses using a combination of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and PanSTARRS color transformation schemes. The α-element enhancement is accounted for following the procedure described in Joyce et al (2023). The shorter-wavelength passbands (e.g., u band) allow for the largest discrimination between isochrones with, e.g., different metallicities and ages, but shorter-wavelength passbands are also more sensitive to variations in reddening and extinction, as discussed above.…”
Section: Color-magnitude Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As studies of the bulge/bar/inner galaxy increase, it has become appreciated that its star formation history may be more complex (Bensby et al 2017), and even reassessments of age (Joyce et al 2023) support an age range among the most metalrich stars. Johnson et al (2022) find a striking concentration of bulge/bar metal-rich stars in the Galactic plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%