2008
DOI: 10.1017/s174392130903186x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ages of stars: The horizontal branch

Abstract: Abstract. Horizontal branch (HB) stars play a particularly important role in the "age debate," since they are at the very center of the long-standing "second parameter" problem. In this review, I discuss some recent progress in our understanding of the nature and origin of HB stars.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aside from metallicity as the "first parameter", age , He content, mass-loss, and cluster central density have been suggested as candidates to be the second, or even third, parameter affecting the morphology of the HB (Fusi Pecci & Bellazzini 1997;Catelan 2008;Dotter et al 2010;Gratton et al 2010;McDonald & Zijlstra 2015;D'Antona et al 2002;Caloi & D'Antona 2005, .etc.). Most of these parameters involve an effect on the mass of the stars which populate the cluster HB.…”
Section: Horizontal Branch Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from metallicity as the "first parameter", age , He content, mass-loss, and cluster central density have been suggested as candidates to be the second, or even third, parameter affecting the morphology of the HB (Fusi Pecci & Bellazzini 1997;Catelan 2008;Dotter et al 2010;Gratton et al 2010;McDonald & Zijlstra 2015;D'Antona et al 2002;Caloi & D'Antona 2005, .etc.). Most of these parameters involve an effect on the mass of the stars which populate the cluster HB.…”
Section: Horizontal Branch Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the exact treatment depends on the modeling of winds on the red giant branch and thermal pulses on the asymptotic giant branch (e.g., see Weidemann 2000 andHabing 1996), phases of stellar evolution that are poorly understood. As Catelan (2008) summarizes, mass loss prescriptions along the red giant branch alone show very different behaviors with metallicity. For example, over a 1 dex metallicity change from [Fe/H] = −1.0 to 0.0, the Mullan (1978) and Schröder & Cuntz (2005) laws predict that ∆M RGB should increase by 0.05 M ⊙ whereas the Goldberg (1979) and Judge & Stencel (1991) laws suggest ∆M increases by 0.15 -0.25 M ⊙ .…”
Section: The Dependence Of Mass Loss On Metallicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of clusters and nearby galaxies, while the observed chemical composition of its members is useful to investigate the chemical evolution of galaxies (e.g., see Girardi & Salaris 2001;Catelan 2009;Nidever et al 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%