The Agrarian Question 2021
DOI: 10.4324/9781003191704-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Agrarian Question Under Globalization 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of capitalism in agriculture and proletarianization of the peasantry have taken various forms and processes under different phases of capitalism. Yet, as warned by Lenin ([1899] 1974) and Kautsky ([1899] 1988), it is a contradictory process, and there is no unique law of agrarian development under capitalism (Akram-Lodhi and Kay, 2009: 10). While defining the dispossession and proletarianization of the peasantry as a historical path of development of capitalism, both Lenin and Kautsky highlighted their persistence by paying attention to the processes through which capital dominate agriculture and transform not only property relations but also forms of exploitation.…”
Section: Crisis Of Social Reproduction For the Classes Of Rural Labou...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of capitalism in agriculture and proletarianization of the peasantry have taken various forms and processes under different phases of capitalism. Yet, as warned by Lenin ([1899] 1974) and Kautsky ([1899] 1988), it is a contradictory process, and there is no unique law of agrarian development under capitalism (Akram-Lodhi and Kay, 2009: 10). While defining the dispossession and proletarianization of the peasantry as a historical path of development of capitalism, both Lenin and Kautsky highlighted their persistence by paying attention to the processes through which capital dominate agriculture and transform not only property relations but also forms of exploitation.…”
Section: Crisis Of Social Reproduction For the Classes Of Rural Labou...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farmers in capitalist markets grapple with this imperative. Their relationship with the land is no longer governed solely by traditional practices or community needs but rather by the unforgiving exigencies of the market and the capitalist ethos of commodification (Akram‐Lodhi et al, 2009). Essentially, market dependence and the social relations of land are deeply intertwined.…”
Section: Market Dependence As a Key To Understanding Agrarian Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, small peasant farms could coexist alongside larger capitalist ones. However, such survival required adaptation to market relations, including altering product mixes, incurring debt and potentially out‐migrating (Akram‐Lodhi & Kay, 2009b, p. 11).…”
Section: Market Dependence As a Key To Understanding Agrarian Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…450–451). However, various scholars have criticised such arguments (Akram-Lodhi & Kay, 2009; McMichael, 2006), by pointing out that while there has been much written about the agrarian change in the present neoliberal period, studies exploring agrarian questions from the context of regional specificities in India largely remain neglected. In this context, a few questions emerge: What considerable changes have emerged regionally in the Indian agricultural economy in the neoliberal period?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%