2017
DOI: 10.1353/lib.2017.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Agriculture Network Information Collaborative (AgNIC): Building on the Past, Looking to the Future

Abstract: The Agriculture Network Information Collaborative (AgNIC) began in 1995 as the Agriculture Network Information Center, a group of four academic libraries and the National Agricultural Library (NAL), with the goal of improving access to reliable agricultural information. One aspect of involvement during the early years was to develop unique subject sites that contained or linked to reliable, curated information on a particular agricultural topic. As the world of online information grew, the focus of AgNIC shift… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The configuration of research networks and platforms for indexing results enables correction of duplication in research (Olsen et al, 2017). A limitation found was the absence of repositories and databases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The configuration of research networks and platforms for indexing results enables correction of duplication in research (Olsen et al, 2017). A limitation found was the absence of repositories and databases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summary of the history of AgNIC and the subject websites, associated partnerships, cooperative agreements for digital projects, and the expansion to include international partners can be found in Olsen, Kelly, and Kopriva (2017). They also outlined recent projects, including crowdsourcing for extension and experiment station documents, working with the NAL to promote PubAg, and working to build a broader coalition within AgNIC.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%