2017
DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2017.1314763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The AKP and the spirit of the ‘new’ Turkey: imagined victim, reactionary mood, and resentful sovereign

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second and wider circle of victimhood, which depicts the Turkish nation under the constant assault of Western imperialists, entered into the AKP's lexicon after the 2013 Gezi Protests. Referring to the Turkish Liberation War (1919)(1920)(1921)(1922) following the fall of the Ottoman Empire, Erdoğan declared a new liberation war against Western powers and their collaborators within Turkey (Yilmaz 2017). Since then, all developments from the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 to the Turkish Lira's fall against the dollar have been linked to Western ambitions to bring down Turkey.…”
Section: Recent Past: the Circles Of Victimhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second and wider circle of victimhood, which depicts the Turkish nation under the constant assault of Western imperialists, entered into the AKP's lexicon after the 2013 Gezi Protests. Referring to the Turkish Liberation War (1919)(1920)(1921)(1922) following the fall of the Ottoman Empire, Erdoğan declared a new liberation war against Western powers and their collaborators within Turkey (Yilmaz 2017). Since then, all developments from the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 to the Turkish Lira's fall against the dollar have been linked to Western ambitions to bring down Turkey.…”
Section: Recent Past: the Circles Of Victimhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beside Erdoğan's recurrent emphasis on being native and national (yerli ve milli), politics was redefined as a war between the national (milli) and nonnational (gayrı milli) (Bulut 2017). Throughout this process, the Turkish case is especially noteworthy due to the centrality of temporal references in Erdoğan's populism, including nostalgia for the Ottoman era and his projections for a 'New Turkey', as well as constant struggles between conflicting representations of the recent and distant pasts (Çınar 2018;Yilmaz 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was ordinary to hear of incidents where a headscarved woman would be harassed in a cafe, which were then compared to incidents where 'Islamist radicals' would attack lightly dressed women in public or people who do not fast during Ramadan. For decades, such narratives supported mutually exclusive, yet interdependent, positions of Muslim injury and victimhood on one hand, and secular anxiety due to an alarming Islamization of politics and culture, on the other (Kandiyoti, 2012;Yilmaz, 2017). 1 However, far from being incompatible cultural or religious differences, the categories of the Islamists and the secularists were products of the historically specific discursive processes of Turkish secularism, processes that absorbed rather complex sets of social differences to map them onto a dichotomic framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Islamist‐conservative intellectuals and political circles in Turkey regard themselves as the true ‘victims' of the modernization process beginning from the Tanzimat period of the late Ottoman Empire (1939–1976). According to this narrative, they ‘suffered at the hands of Kemalist state elites who were collaborating with the Western forces to oppress “innocent,” “devout” and “authentically” Anatolian children of the country' (Yılmaz : 483). Thus, the narrative of victimhood is framed mainly through this ‘chosen' trauma of modernization regardless of a hundred years' course of events such as the establishment of the Turkish‐Islamic synthesis as the official state ideology in the 1980's when the assumed secularism of the state and the military was questioned as a result of the 1980 military coup.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%