2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Al Hoceima (Morocco) earthquake of 24 February 2004, analysis and interpretation of data from ENVISAT ASAR and SPOT5 validated by ground-based observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of differences in strike has the smallest standard deviation, with most strike differences being smaller than 20°. The greatest difference in strike is 44°, for the model by Tahayt et al [2009] of the 2004 Al Hoceima earthquake, which was also found to be quite different to other InSAR strike estimations, as discussed in section 3.2. A possible explanation for this discrepancy is that this model is a cross fault model, consisting of two subevents separated by about 3 s [e.g., Stich et al , 2005] being quite different from a point source model, such as used in the GCMT approach.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Seismically and Geodetically Derived Earcontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distribution of differences in strike has the smallest standard deviation, with most strike differences being smaller than 20°. The greatest difference in strike is 44°, for the model by Tahayt et al [2009] of the 2004 Al Hoceima earthquake, which was also found to be quite different to other InSAR strike estimations, as discussed in section 3.2. A possible explanation for this discrepancy is that this model is a cross fault model, consisting of two subevents separated by about 3 s [e.g., Stich et al , 2005] being quite different from a point source model, such as used in the GCMT approach.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Seismically and Geodetically Derived Earcontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Differences in strike for a given earthquake are generally smaller than 20° (with a median variability over 18 earthquakes of about 4° and σ = 10°), except for the Al Hoceima 2004 earthquake, for which there is a difference of 44° between the strike determined by Tahayt et al [2009] and that found by Biggs et al [2006] (see Table 3). For the 19 earthquakes in Tables 1–3 with more than one value of fault dip reported, the variability in dip is smaller than 20° (with a median of about 8° and σ = 6°), except for the 2000 Cankiri earthquake, for which there is a difference of 22° between the fault dip determined by Wright [2000] and that obtained by Cakir and Akoglu [2008].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Variability Of Insar Source Models For A Givmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1c). Onshore field studies following the 2004 earthquake showed cracks through the Tisirene Flyschs and the Ketama units, with a general orientation of r3 around N40°(A€ ıt Galindo-Zald ıvar et al, 2009;Tahayt et al, 2009). However, no clear primary surface rupture can be observed Biggs et al, 2006).…”
Section: Recent Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not use strike, dip and rake values that were fixed in some InSAR studies (see paper 1). As in the comparisons between ICMT and GCMT parameters (see paper 1 and M = −1.621 diagram in Figure 8), there are large differences in strike (greater than 40°) for the 2004 Al Hoceima earthquake between all our solutions and the InSAR solution of Tahayt et al [2009]. Other than that outlier, there is good agreement between the strike values found in our inversions and the ICMT strike values, with the models S20RTS and vHW99 showing the smallest differences, which are similar to those between the GCMT and ICMT solutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%