2024
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07192-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Alarming Rate of Malnutrition after Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass. A single Centre Experience

Ala Wafa,
Ahmad Bashir,
Ricardo V. Cohen
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…
We thank Abokhozima and Zidan for their comments on our study, and we are happy to address their questions.Single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI) has a low perioperative complication rate, short-term significant weight loss, and resolution of obesity-related complications. However, this comes with a high expense of malnutrition, even in our short-term follow-up series with a 20% revision rate [1].The size of the gastro-ileal anastomosis in our series was 40 mm and not 60 mm. According to a systematic review and meta-analysis of 941 patients that underwent SASI, examining the effect of the size of the gastro-ileal anastomosis on % excess weight loss (EWL) and complications, comparing 4 to 3 cm anastomosis, revealed that a 4-cm anastomosis had better EWL at 12 months (94.3% vs 79.7%) and less complication rate (2.6% vs 14.4%) [2].The site of the gastro-ileal anastomosis in our series was at the greater curve of the antrum, as seen in the video.
…”
contrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…
We thank Abokhozima and Zidan for their comments on our study, and we are happy to address their questions.Single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI) has a low perioperative complication rate, short-term significant weight loss, and resolution of obesity-related complications. However, this comes with a high expense of malnutrition, even in our short-term follow-up series with a 20% revision rate [1].The size of the gastro-ileal anastomosis in our series was 40 mm and not 60 mm. According to a systematic review and meta-analysis of 941 patients that underwent SASI, examining the effect of the size of the gastro-ileal anastomosis on % excess weight loss (EWL) and complications, comparing 4 to 3 cm anastomosis, revealed that a 4-cm anastomosis had better EWL at 12 months (94.3% vs 79.7%) and less complication rate (2.6% vs 14.4%) [2].The site of the gastro-ileal anastomosis in our series was at the greater curve of the antrum, as seen in the video.
…”
contrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI) has a low perioperative complication rate, short-term significant weight loss, and resolution of obesity-related complications. However, this comes with a high expense of malnutrition, even in our short-term follow-up series with a 20% revision rate [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The extent of the common loop formed during the SASI bypass can range between 250 and 350 cm [ 7 , 14 , 15 ]. A shorter common limb may increase malabsorption and enhanced weight loss but could also elevate the risk of complications [ 14 , 16 ]. The decision-making process for the common limb length during SASI bypass should consider the balance between achieving adequate weight loss and minimizing the risk of nutritional complications such as protein-caloric malnutrition or iron metabolism disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the potential adverse effects on iron metabolism parameters in some patients, it is worth emphasizing that SASI bypass has promising outcomes, particularly in addressing metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes [5,[14][15][16][17][18]. As a malabsorptive surgery, SASI bypass may benefit individuals with a preference for sweets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%