The ALARP Principle in the Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Acceptability of Investment Risk

Abstract

The process of allocating financial resources is extremely complex-both because the selection of investments depends on multiple, and interrelated, variables, and constraints that limit the eligibility domain of the solutions, and because the feasibility of projects is influenced by risk factors. In this sense, it is essential to develop economic evaluations on a probabilistic basis. Nevertheless, for the civil engineering sector, the literature emphasizes the centrality of risk management, in order to establish interventions for risk mitigation. On the other hand, few methodologies are available to systematically compare ante and post mitigation design risk, along with the verification of the economic convenience of these actions. The aim of the paper is to demonstrate how these limits can be at least partially overcome by integrating, in the traditional Cost-Benefit Analysis schemes, the As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) logic. According to it, the risk is tolerable only if it is impossible to reduce it further or if the costs to mitigate it are disproportionate to the benefits obtainable. The research outlines the phases of an innovative protocol for managing investment risks. On the basis of a case study dealing with a project for the recovery and transformation of an ancient medieval village into a widespread-hotel, the novelty of the model consists of the characterization of acceptability and tolerability thresholds of the investment risk, as well as its ability to guarantee the triangular balance between risks, costs and benefits deriving from mitigation options.

Sustainable Investment: Interrelated among Corporate Governance, Economic Performance and Market Risks Using Investor Preference Approach

“…Market risks are when there is the possibility of an investor experiencing losses due to risks that affect overall financial market performance [13,35]. Market risk and specific risk are identified as oil price (C14), exchange rate (C15), the interest rate of the United States (C16), and inflation (C17), and are also the net receivers of risk spillovers.…”

Urban Density and Household-Electricity Consumption: An Analysis of the Italian Residential Building Stock

“…According to the dependent variable, all the independent ones are related to this year. The socioeconomic features represent mostly the spending capacity of households and the wealthy of the cities and territories, in general (Bianco et al 2013;Nesticò et al 2018;Bencardino and Nesticò 2019). Employment rates and GDPs are available only at the provincial and regional levels, while per capita income is at the urban scale (Del Giudice et al 2019a).…”

Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Methods for the Enhancement of Historical Buildings

“…Thus, unlike the cost-benefit analysis that expresses the judgment of economic convenience only on the monetary criterion, the multicriteria analysis rationalizes the selection process through the optimization of a multi-criteria vector, weighted according to the decision-maker s priorities. In this way, it is possible to include both monetizable and extra-economic criteria, measurable only in physical or qualitative terms, in a single evaluation process [20,21].…”