1996
DOI: 10.1080/00033799600200401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The alchemical sources of Robert Boyle's corpuscular philosophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on a more subtle semantic analysis of these alchemical authorities, Newman concludes that we can no longer view Boyle's corpuscular philosophy as an imposition of physics on chemistry. Rather, it grew out of the chemical tradition itself (Newman 1994(Newman , 1996. Newman's analysis supports in turn Lawrence M. Principe's project of authenticating Boyle as a chrysopoeic adept (Principe 1992(Principe , 1998.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Based on a more subtle semantic analysis of these alchemical authorities, Newman concludes that we can no longer view Boyle's corpuscular philosophy as an imposition of physics on chemistry. Rather, it grew out of the chemical tradition itself (Newman 1994(Newman , 1996. Newman's analysis supports in turn Lawrence M. Principe's project of authenticating Boyle as a chrysopoeic adept (Principe 1992(Principe , 1998.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries the experimental practices of chemical, alchemical and iatrochemical traditions led to the need for a new theory of matter and qualities that intensifi ed criticism towards Aristotelian principles (Clericuzio 1990 ;Newman 1996 ). This growing critique of Aristotelian and scholastic principles concerning matter along with the reconsideration of the ancient Greek atomic theories of matter of Democritus, Leukippus and Epicure, infl uenced in multiple ways the formation of new corpuscular theories; most importantly these circumstances begged for further empirical testing and observation on particular qualities in order to unveil their nature.…”
Section: The Seventeenth Century Historical Context On Coldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, he was a very accomplished scientist who made significant contributions to a wide range of chemical and other scientific areas. Although widely acclaimed as "the father of modern chemistry" in standard histories of chemistry [10,13], revisionists correctly identify that he was not alone in the chemical firmament, but disagree about the degree of influence that he had on the development of the subject [64][65][66]. Fortunately, it is not our mandate to enter into this debate.…”
Section: Robert Boyle-the End Of Alchemy or The Beginning Of Chemistry?mentioning
confidence: 99%