1974
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb40282.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Alcoholic's Perception of Self: A Retrospective Comparison of Mood and Behavior During States of Sobriety and Intoxication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aggression has been defined as the time people looked at pictures with aggressive motifs [126,127], how often a person made graffiti paintings [128], changing of self-estimation in an aggressive direction [129], increased self-assertion [130,131], power in interaction with another person [132][133][134] and the ability to resist social pressure [135,136]. No support of the disinhibition hypothesis is given by these studies.…”
Section: Rating Scalesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Aggression has been defined as the time people looked at pictures with aggressive motifs [126,127], how often a person made graffiti paintings [128], changing of self-estimation in an aggressive direction [129], increased self-assertion [130,131], power in interaction with another person [132][133][134] and the ability to resist social pressure [135,136]. No support of the disinhibition hypothesis is given by these studies.…”
Section: Rating Scalesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Baumann, Obitz, and Reich (1982), using a semantic differential measure of self-labeling, reported less denial among alcoholic clients before treatment than afterward. Further, self-labeling as “alcoholic” has been found to be unrelated to degree of problem recognition (Shaw, Cartwright, Spratley, & Harwin, 1978), and alcohol abusers in general have been found to be able and willing to acknowledge abnormal and problematic consequences of their drinking (Landeen, 1979; Orford, 1973; Richard & Burley, 1978; Tamerin et al, 1974). Nor is problem recognition sufficient for recovery (Blane, 1968; Moore & Murphy, 1961).…”
Section: Disadvantages Of a Trait Model Of Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed a trait model minimizes the importance of therapist behavior: “When the patient willingly admits his problem and is sincerely motivated to change, the battle is largely won, irrespective of the treatment technique” (Moore & Murphy, 1961, p. 605). The resulting negative perceptions of unmotivated clients may in turn evoke counterproductive therapist patterns such as suspiciousness, hostility, moralizing, low empathy, and power struggles (Bateson, 1971; Mann, 1950; Miller, 1983b; Milmoe, Rosenthal, Blane, Chafetz, & Wolf, 1967; Tamerin et al, 1974).…”
Section: Disadvantages Of a Trait Model Of Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation