Thermophilic anaerobic noncellulolytic Thermoanaerobacter species are of great biotechnological importance in cellulosic ethanol production due to their ability to produce high ethanol yields by simultaneous fermentation of hexose and pentose. Understanding the genome structure of these species is critical to improving and implementing these bacteria for possible biotechnological use in consolidated bioprocessing schemes (CBP) for cellulosic ethanol production. Here we describe a comparative genome analysis of two ethanologenic bacteria, Thermoanaerobacter sp. X514 and Thermoanaerobacter pseudethanolicus 39E. Compared to 39E, X514 has several unique key characteristics important to cellulosic biotechnology, including additional alcohol dehydrogenases and xylose transporters, modifications to pentose metabolism, and a complete vitamin B 12 biosynthesis pathway. Experimental results from growth, metabolic flux, and microarray gene expression analyses support genome sequencing-based predictions which help to explain the distinct differences in ethanol production between these strains. The availability of whole-genome sequence and comparative genomic analyses will aid in engineering and optimizing Thermoanaerobacter strains for viable CBP strategies.Global energy demands will increase significantly in coming decades (16), and renewable energy sources such as biofuels have been proposed to help reduce dependence upon fossil energy (8,23,27,49). Current efforts focus on biofuel production from renewable lignocellulosic feedstock (e.g., switchgrass), which constitutes ϳ50% of the world's biomass (2,8,23,27,49). Although intensive research and development have been performed on the effective utilization of lignocellulose, problems associated with practical use of this material have not been resolved fully (13). When enzymatic hydrolysis is adopted for cellulosic ethanol production, different levels of process integration can be visualized: (i) separate (or sequential) hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF), where the enzymes (cellulases) are used separately from fermentation tanks; (ii) simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), which consolidates enzymatic hydrolysis with fermentation of hexose or pentose; (iii) simultaneous saccharification and cofermentation (SSCF), which further combines the fermentation of hexose and pentose together; and (iv) consolidated bioprocessing (CBP), where all required enzymes and ethanol are produced in a single reactor (1,13,24,29,46,51). While these production schemes represent increasing levels of simplification through process consolidation, consolidation of multiple steps often results in a loss of process efficiency. Thus, improving the efficiency of individual steps, such as cellulose hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation, remains an important task for the development of economically feasible cellulosic bioethanol.Recent efforts have focused on metabolic engineering and (more recently) synthetic biology to produce strains or consortia capable of producing biofuels. Efforts to ...