1990
DOI: 10.1016/0734-189x(90)90148-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The algebraic basis of mathematical morphology I. Dilations and erosions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
170
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
170
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As a matter of fact, image analysis techniques on intensity regular mesh, like classical bitmap intensity images are quite mastered. Some works deal with general graph morphology operators focusing on vertices in the theoretical framework of complete lattices (Serra, 1988) (Heijmans & Ronse, 1990) (Dougherty, 1993). But the equivalent operators for geometrical irregular mesh have not been explored extensively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, image analysis techniques on intensity regular mesh, like classical bitmap intensity images are quite mastered. Some works deal with general graph morphology operators focusing on vertices in the theoretical framework of complete lattices (Serra, 1988) (Heijmans & Ronse, 1990) (Dougherty, 1993). But the equivalent operators for geometrical irregular mesh have not been explored extensively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let (L, ) and (L , ) be two complete lattices (which do not need to be equal). All the following definitions and results are common to the general algebraic framework of mathematical morphology in complete lattices [10,11,15,18]. Different terminologies can be found in different lattice theory related contexts (refer to [16] for equivalence tables).…”
Section: Mathematical Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the lattice theoretic basis of set-based mathematical morphology has long been understood [8,3], this is not the case when we move to graphs and hypergraphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%