2014
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The allometry between secondary sexual traits and body size is nonlinear among cervids

Abstract: Allometric relationships between sexually selected traits and body size have been extensively studied in recent decades. While sexually selected traits generally display positive allometry, a few recent reports have suggested that allometric relationships are not always linear. In male cervids, having both long antlers and large size provides benefits in terms of increased mating success. However, such attributes are costly to grow and maintain, and these costs might constrain antler length from increasing at … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, contrary to our results, when comparing three tropical deer species, Pathak et al (2001) found that it was the smallest species that had the lowest ash content (60.3% in Axis porcinus vs. 62.5% in A. axis and 62.9% in Rucervus duvaucelii). Other explanations may be related to evolutionary (but not adaptive) constraints, as proposed by Blob and LaBarbera (2001); or to the existence of adaptive constraints based on the quadratic body mass-antler allometry found in cervids (Lemaître et al 2014; larger antlers would have similar mechanical properties with smaller expenditure in minerals). Few studies attempted to investigate inter-specific differences in antler traits (Kitchener 1991, Blob & LaBarbera 2001, Pathak et al 2001, Blob & Snelgrove 2006.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, contrary to our results, when comparing three tropical deer species, Pathak et al (2001) found that it was the smallest species that had the lowest ash content (60.3% in Axis porcinus vs. 62.5% in A. axis and 62.9% in Rucervus duvaucelii). Other explanations may be related to evolutionary (but not adaptive) constraints, as proposed by Blob and LaBarbera (2001); or to the existence of adaptive constraints based on the quadratic body mass-antler allometry found in cervids (Lemaître et al 2014; larger antlers would have similar mechanical properties with smaller expenditure in minerals). Few studies attempted to investigate inter-specific differences in antler traits (Kitchener 1991, Blob & LaBarbera 2001, Pathak et al 2001, Blob & Snelgrove 2006.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Males also grow antlers anew each year, which are involved in fights during intra-sexual competition and their size is positively associated with lifetime reproductive success [25,26]. Antlers are expected to be energetically costly both to grow and maintain [27], because they constitute the only mammalian structure that is regenerated repeatedly over life and shows the fastest growth observed for an animal tissue [28]. Overall, the quantity of energy a male expends each mating season has been estimated to be around 25% of the annual energy budget [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mammals, the allocation of resources to sexual competition by males can occur through different pathways. For example, the growth of secondary sexual traits such as weapons, that generally involves increased body mass (Lemaître et al, 2014) and associated behaviors increase success in intrasexual competition, and are thereby subject to strong sexual selection pressures (Weckerly, 1998;Bro-Jørgensen, 2007;Lindenfors, 2007;Plard et al, 2011). Males sexually selected to allocate heavily to intra-sexual competition should increase their chances of reproducing, but in return are expected to experience an earlier or faster senescence (Bonduriansky et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%