1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2009-2_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The alpha spending function approach to interim data analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An O'Brien-Fleming stopping boundary for efficacy was calculated with the use of a Lan-DeMets alpha-spending function on the basis of the number of events observed at the data-cutoff date. 15,16 All reported P values are two-sided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An O'Brien-Fleming stopping boundary for efficacy was calculated with the use of a Lan-DeMets alpha-spending function on the basis of the number of events observed at the data-cutoff date. 15,16 All reported P values are two-sided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Randomization was stratified according to the β 2 -microglobulin level (<2.5 mg per liter vs. ≥2.5 mg per liter), previous therapy with bortezomib (no vs. yes), and previous therapy with lenalidomide (no vs. yes). Carfilzomib was administered as a 10-minute infusion on days 1,2,8,9,15, and 16 (starting dose, 20 mg per square meter on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1; target dose, 27 mg per square meter thereafter) during cycles 1 through 12 and on days 1, 2, 15, and 16 during cycles 13 through 18, after which carfilzomib was discontinued. Lenalidomide (25 mg) was given on days 1 through 21.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For larger two-group designs, additional interim analyses are likely for safety assessments. The reviewers monitoring the trial must consider safety trade-offs, additional efficacy variables, and other conditions that might arise unexpectedly during the trial (DeMets and Lan 1995). Because of this complexity, the calculation of the planned decision criteria assumed conservative nonbinding stopping rules to reflect their role as efficient guidance rather than rigorously enforced rules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can then proceed to conduct interim analysis times at information fraction t j equal to the observed number of subjects divided by 210. Similar formulations can be developed for the comparison of means, repeated measures, and survival analysis [48]. However, for most applications, the standard sample size formulas with the new alpha spending function final critical value will be a very good approximation.…”
Section: Trial Designmentioning
confidence: 95%