2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Altmetric Score: A New Measure for Article-Level Dissemination and Impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
172
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
172
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of ‘altmetrics’ (referring to non-traditional alternative article-level metrics) was implemented in 2010 in reference to new metrics that evaluate the early influence of scholarly material on broad audiences in comparison with citation counts 4. Altmetrics measure scientific and social impacts of an article after publication, based on the number of ‘mentions’ of an article across various online sources 4 5…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of ‘altmetrics’ (referring to non-traditional alternative article-level metrics) was implemented in 2010 in reference to new metrics that evaluate the early influence of scholarly material on broad audiences in comparison with citation counts 4. Altmetrics measure scientific and social impacts of an article after publication, based on the number of ‘mentions’ of an article across various online sources 4 5…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Altmetric scores track the disseminative impact of research articles online by tracking mentions on social media (e.g., Facebook, Twitter) and mentions on blogs, podcasts, and news outlets. 9 Largely due to discussion spurred by the SGEM podcast and blog post, the Altmetric score for the article reached 71, the highest score of all the articles that have been published in CJEM (Figure 3).…”
Section: Results Of the Social Media Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a detailed review of Altmetric scores, Trueger et al highlight that "dissemination scores do not replace the need for readers' independent ability to critique the primary literature." 19 The social media dissemination of the paper, although impressive, may have been biased and inflated in that the authors of the paper and podcast are quite active on social media and involved in social media broadcasting.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%