“…The expected fractionation due to bacterial reduction of aqueous sulfate is at least −25‰ (Habicht and Canfield, ), which would lead to a starting isotopic composition for SO 4 2− of approximately +6.5‰, which is much higher than observed. However, the anticipated starting range matches well with the range for δ 34 S‐SO 4 2− in shield terrain (+6.0‰ ± 5.9‰, n = 159, unpublished data), found in a large regional groundwater study near Sudbury (Dell et al ., ) and in local studies near mineral deposits in northeastern Ontario (+10.3‰ ± 4.3‰, n = 16; Fritz et al ., ). A likely scenario is that the observed deep H 2 S originally resulted from the bacterial reduction of aqueous SO 4 2− (δ 34 S‐SO 4 2− of approximately +6.5‰) in the ambient groundwater of the regional aquifers, yielding the observed (average) δ 34 S‐S 2− value of −18.5‰ for aqueous H 2 S. The methane commonly observed in groundwater in the fine‐grained glacial sediments of the Cochrane Till (Hamilton et al ., ,b,c) is evidence that reducing agents, likely in the form of buried organic material, are present in these glacial sediments.…”