2010
DOI: 10.1037/a0020454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ambiguity of the psychoanalytic situation and its relation to the analyst's reverie.

Abstract: This article is about ambiguity in psychoanalysis, an ambiguity that is particularly striking in the psychoanalytic relationship between patient and analyst. The analyst is a professional in his consulting room, in his chair behind the patient, but he is at the same time a figure in the patient's realization of his inner world of objects. The analyst is a transference figure, but he is also a real person with his own inner private reverie and a subjective contribution to the analytic process. For some patients… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I am a warm supporter of working through, and a favorite paper of mine is the one by Pick (1985) called “Working Through in the Countertransference.” With seriously disturbed patients in particular, the analyst has to involve, and many times disclose, his reverie and mental functioning in ways that can be very demanding. I have described this process with an adult patient in another article (Våpenstad, 2010). With this man, who was extremely traumatized in his early childhood, working through mainly took place in the analyst’s reverie.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I am a warm supporter of working through, and a favorite paper of mine is the one by Pick (1985) called “Working Through in the Countertransference.” With seriously disturbed patients in particular, the analyst has to involve, and many times disclose, his reverie and mental functioning in ways that can be very demanding. I have described this process with an adult patient in another article (Våpenstad, 2010). With this man, who was extremely traumatized in his early childhood, working through mainly took place in the analyst’s reverie.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a position implies the need to remove the emphasis from consideration of this phenomenon as a stable feature to the process of functioning of tolerance, studying the process of «tolerating» uncertainty. E. Vapenstad (2010) writes about the possibility of developing tolerance in the process of psychotherapy [16]. L. Kajs and D. McCollum (2010) in a study of administrative employees of educational institutions found a decrease in tolerance for uncertainty with increasing age of respondents [17].…”
Section: Tolerance To Uncertainty (Ambiguity) As a Dynamic Characteri...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors consider tolerance to ambiguity as a dynamic personal characterictic, that can advance during professional education (DeRoma, Martin and Kessler, 2003) and psychotherapy (Våpenstad, 2010). Kajs L. T. and McCollum D. L. point out that tolerance to ambiguity can increase with extension of life experience and age (Kajs and McCollum, 2010).…”
Section: Grishina Anastasia Vasilievna 1* Abakumova Irina Vladimiromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior of a person in the pandemic situation is still poorly understood as this is the first time when the mankind faces such a global and unknown threat and takes such measures to prevent its spread. Besides, the uniqueness of this situation lies in the fact that the pandemic has affected all spheres of human life -work, leisure, nutrition, sports (Våpenstad, 2010). One of the main issues in our knowledge of COVID-19 is a lack of facts about its real origin and effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%