The amperometric biosensor for detection of sodium dodecyl sulfate

Reshetilov, A. N.; Semenchuk, I. N.; Iliasov, Pavel V.; Taranova, L. A.

doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(97)00071-8

Cited by 38 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Particular attention is paid to application of microorganisms with this purpose, because the cells growing on SAS-containing medium prove to be adapted to their oxidation. The studies performed in the work (Reshetilov et al, 1997b) have shown that the cells of P. rathonis are highly sensitive to anionic and nonionogenic SAS. The comparative data on application of bacteria from the genera Pseudomonas and Achromobacter in the amperometric biosensor for SAS detection are presented.…”

Section: Surfactant Detectionmentioning

confidence: 98%

The Microbial Cell Based Biosensors

Решетилов¹,

Iliasov²,

Reshetilova³

2010

Intelligent and Biosensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Surfactant Detectionmentioning

confidence: 98%

The Microbial Cell Based Biosensors

Решетилов¹,

Iliasov²,

Reshetilova³

2010

Intelligent and Biosensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Oxygen consumption acted as an indicator of cell metabolism and thus of the surfactant content of the sample. The limit of detection achieved for sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was within 0.25-0.75 mg/l [71]. Taranova et al [72] also studied the sensitivity and selectivity of biosensors based on bacterial strain Pseudomonas and Achromobacter and their ability to degrade the anionic surfactants.…”

Section: Surfactantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biosensors for environmental applications: Future development trends

Rodríguez-Mozaz

Marco

Alda

et al. 2004

Pure and Applied Chemistry

199

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Biosensors can be excellent analytical tools for monitoring programs working to implement legislation. In this article, biosensors for environmental analysis and monitoring are extensively reviewed. Examples of biosensors for the most important families of environmental pollutants, including some commercial devices, are presented. Finally, future trends in biosensor development are discussed. In this context, bioelectronics, nanotechnology, miniaturization, and especially biotechnology seem to be growing areas that will have a marked influence on the development of new biosensing strategies in the next future.

show abstract

“…These biosensors are able to detect various pollutants [6][7][8][9] and evaluate integral parameters of the environment, including the rate of biological oxygen demand (BOD) and total toxicity [10,11]. The sensor model described in [8] was successfully used for detecting linear alkylsulfonates in water of the Ayaze River in Japan.…”

Section: Evaluation Of Substrate Specificity Of Biosensor Models Basementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The sensor model described in [8] was successfully used for detecting linear alkylsulfonates in water of the Ayaze River in Japan. It was shown in our earlier works [9,[12][13][14] that some bacterial strains which degrade anionic SASs (ASASs) were able to oxidize these substrates, making it possible to use an oxygen electrode as a biosensor transducer for monitoring SASs.Overall, it seems more promising to use microbial strains with a broad spectrum of metabolic capacity in the biotechnology of water purification. Broad substrate specificity is thought to be the key factor of prac- Abstract -Models of microbial biosensors based on 11 strains of degraders of surface-active substances (SASs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were studied.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of substrate specificity of biosensor models based on strains degrading polycyclic aromatic compounds

Reshetilov

Iliasov

Fesay

et al. 2005

Appl Biochem Microbiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of substrate specificity of biosensor models based on strains degrading polycyclic aromatic compoundsReshetilov, A N; Iliasov, P V; Fesay, A P; Ivashchenko, G V; Taranova, L A; Winther-Nielsen, M; Emnéus, Jenny Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Reshetilov, A. N., Iliasov, P. V., Fesay, A. P., Ivashchenko, G. V., Taranova, L. A., Winther-Nielsen, M., & Emnéus, J. (2005). Evaluation of substrate specificity of biosensor models based on strains degrading polycyclic aromatic compounds. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 41(1), 56-62. DOI: 10.1007/s10438-005-0011-y General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.• You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal 0003-6838/05/4101-Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2005, pp. 56-62. Translated from Prikladnaya Biokhimiya i Mikrobiologiya, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2005, pp. 64-71. Original Russian Text Copyright © 2005 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) constitute one of the most dangerous classes of pollutants. A number of derivatives of these compounds belong to the group of supertoxicants, i.e., compounds capable of exerting a toxic effect on a broad range of organisms even in concentrations 10 -12 -10 -9 M. In addition, many of these compounds have a cumulative effect, suppress immune and endocrine systems, have carcinogenic activity, etc. Combined environmental pollution with PAHs and surface-active substances (SASs) is of particular danger, because surfactants are able to solubilize substrates of many types. Besides, SASs constitute a large group of xenobiotics commonly found in industrial and household waste. Although surfactants are less dangerous than PAHs and surfactants in low concentrations readily degrade in the environment, their content in ecosystems of some regions is substantially above the normal level, and this fact itself is an environmental hazard.Surfactants aggravate toxicity of polycyclic compounds by solubilizing them. In some cases, this process facilitates and accelerates their biodegradation by increasing the concentration of accessible xenobiotics in the aqueous phase [1]. The effect of acceleration of biodegradation of PAHs in the presence of SASs was reported for some degrader strains [2,3] and successfully used in bioremediation processes, nonionogenic SASs (NSASs) being the most effective because of low toxicity and high rate of biodegradation [4,5]. Thus, strains capable of mediating accelerated degradation of PAHs in the presence of SASs (nonionic detergents, in particular) are ...

show abstract

The amperometric biosensor for detection of sodium dodecyl sulfate

Cited by 38 publications

References 9 publications

The Microbial Cell Based Biosensors

The Microbial Cell Based Biosensors

Biosensors for environmental applications: Future development trends

Evaluation of substrate specificity of biosensor models based on strains degrading polycyclic aromatic compounds

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About