2017
DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The amplitude of coagulation curves from thrombin time tests allows dysfibrinogenemia caused by the common mutation FGG‐Arg301 to be distinguished from hypofibrinogenemia

Abstract: Examination of the amplitude of coagulation curves generated during TT tests may provide additional information to enable the differential diagnoses of diseases following a low fibrinogen measurement by the Clauss method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also compared Fibrinography to the widely used turbidity measurement performed at a single wavelength (e.g., 7 and references herein). Our results demonstrate that measuring the optical density at a single wavelength mainly determines the fibrinogen concentration in the sample, as expected from the similarity of this assay with the prothrombin time-derived fibrinogen determination, 2729 rather than the structure of the clot. Therefore, maximum turbidity in plasma clots is not a determinant of fibrin's structure, but is rather a measure of the fibrinogen concentration, even in the case of patients’ plasma as shown recently by Jacquemin et al 29 Besides, when comparing data from patients (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…We also compared Fibrinography to the widely used turbidity measurement performed at a single wavelength (e.g., 7 and references herein). Our results demonstrate that measuring the optical density at a single wavelength mainly determines the fibrinogen concentration in the sample, as expected from the similarity of this assay with the prothrombin time-derived fibrinogen determination, 2729 rather than the structure of the clot. Therefore, maximum turbidity in plasma clots is not a determinant of fibrin's structure, but is rather a measure of the fibrinogen concentration, even in the case of patients’ plasma as shown recently by Jacquemin et al 29 Besides, when comparing data from patients (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A ratio of functional on antigenic fibrinogen level higher than 0.7 is traditionally used to distinguish between hypofibrinogenemia and dysfibrinogenemia [ 8 ], although the sensitivity and specificity of this cut-off has never been established [ 9 ]. The amplitude of coagulation curves from thrombin time tests should allow for the easy determination of the type of fibrinogen deficiency when the antigenic fibrinogen assessment is not available [ 10 ]. Due to the limited sensitivity of coagulation assays in the case of very low fibrinogen levels (e.g., <0.5 g/L), it can be challenging to distinguish afibrinogenemia from severe hypofibrinogenemia [ 11 ].…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Quantitative Fibrinogen Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, FGG, a gene encoding γ component of fibrinogen, has vasonstriction and chemotactic activities that regulates cell adhesion and spreading [41]. Upregulation of the gene in SCLC can be correlated with high metastatic capability of the subtype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FGG, as discussed before is a gene encoding γ component of fibrinogen, which is involved in the process of blood clotting. Any perturbations in these genes are associated with the homeostatic imbalance between coagulation and anticoagulation [41]. Thus, differentially expressed FGG might contribute to the processes of pathologic thrombosis and angiogenesis associated with cancer cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%