2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The amygdala encodes level of perceived fear but not emotional ambiguity in visual scenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result may be surprising in light of evidence that the amygdala is more reliably activated in response to fearful faces than to other expressions [Fusar‐Poli et al, ], but it is consistent with previous studies showing greater amygdala activation to approaching faces irrespective of emotion [Schienle et al, ]. Existing accounts implicate the amygdala—particularly its basolateral nucleus—in encoding salient, ambiguous or unpredictable information [Davis et al, ; Whalen, ], and in evaluating and representing the intensity of emotional stimuli [Kryklywy et al, ]. Both these processes are likely brought to bear in our paradigm; when approached by other individuals, it is likely advantageous to both identify and assess the intensity of their emotional states, in order to infer their behavioural intentions and adjust our behavior accordingly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result may be surprising in light of evidence that the amygdala is more reliably activated in response to fearful faces than to other expressions [Fusar‐Poli et al, ], but it is consistent with previous studies showing greater amygdala activation to approaching faces irrespective of emotion [Schienle et al, ]. Existing accounts implicate the amygdala—particularly its basolateral nucleus—in encoding salient, ambiguous or unpredictable information [Davis et al, ; Whalen, ], and in evaluating and representing the intensity of emotional stimuli [Kryklywy et al, ]. Both these processes are likely brought to bear in our paradigm; when approached by other individuals, it is likely advantageous to both identify and assess the intensity of their emotional states, in order to infer their behavioural intentions and adjust our behavior accordingly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these data, we hypothesized that activity within the amygdala would be enhanced in response to approaching compared to receding faces, and would be associated with greater interpersonal distance. A solid body of research has also supported a privileged role of the amygdala in processing fear‐related stimuli [Adolphs et al, ; Aube et al, ; Kryklywy et al, ; Phillips et al, ], particularly fearful facial expressions [Fusar‐Poli et al, ; Thomas et al, ; Whalen et al, ]. In light of this evidence, we also predicted the amygdala would be preferentially engaged in response to fearful faces relative to other expressions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this concept, the amygdala should be activated when encountering any stimuli that convey a biological significance for the individual, which can be of either positive or negative valence (Sergerie et al, 2008 ). Neuroimaging studies support this assumption by showing that amygdala activity varies according to the level of arousal evoked by a stimulus (Kensinger and Corkin, 2004 ; Sabatinelli et al, 2005 ; Kensinger and Schacter, 2006 ; Kryklywy et al, 2013 ). However, valence, which is the other main dimension in the Circumplex model of affect (Russell, 1980 ), seems to have a smaller effect on amygdala activity (Phan et al, 2002 ; Wager et al, 2003 ; Sergerie et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the neural level, we primarily focused on amygdala activity and connectivity because this brain area represents a key region in the evaluation and representation of fear intensity and pain and in deciphering threats in visual scenes ( Kryklywy et al, 2013 ). Furthermore, amygdala activity and its functional connectivity to the prefrontal cortex (PFC) have been shown to be meaningfully different between individuals with different emotional modulation strategies and are strongly related to treatment response in chronic pain conditions ( Bushnell et al, 2013 ; Silvers et al, 2014 ; Simons et al, 2014b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%