2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Analgesic Effect of Abobotulinum and Incobotulinum Toxins Type A in Central Poststroke Pain: Two Case Reports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barbosa et al also published a case report in which an analgesic effect was obtained using BoNT-A in patients with central poststroke pain. In two patients with stroke, injection of BoNT-A 200 U into the affected area under EMG guidance resulted in a decrease in NRS after a 3-month follow-up [ 64 ]. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 273 patients with poststroke spasticity was performed.…”
Section: Clinical Study Of Botulinum Toxin For Neuropathic Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barbosa et al also published a case report in which an analgesic effect was obtained using BoNT-A in patients with central poststroke pain. In two patients with stroke, injection of BoNT-A 200 U into the affected area under EMG guidance resulted in a decrease in NRS after a 3-month follow-up [ 64 ]. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 273 patients with poststroke spasticity was performed.…”
Section: Clinical Study Of Botulinum Toxin For Neuropathic Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been reported in a report of two cases in which the patients also experienced an unexpected reduction in CPSP post botulinum toxin. However this was improvement lessened with time and analgesia on repeat therapies was not reported [3]. This case demonstrates a clear long term improvement in a neuropathic pain sensation, which was independent from the improvement in spasticity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…One major limitation is the use of different toxin serotypes and preparations which hampers the comparison of studies' results. Most studies specified the use of the common BoNT/A brand (Botox®) ( 27 , 29 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 40 , 43 , 44 , 52 , 55 , 67 71 , 74 , 77 , 84 , 89 , 90 , 93 , 101 ) or other BoNT/A compounds (e.g., HengLi®, Meditoxin®, Disport®) ( 33 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 50 , 62 , 72 , 94 , 96 ), but, in many cases, no specification of the BoNT/A serotype was provided ( 27 , 31 , 35 , 37 , 42 , 47 , 51 , 53 , 54 , 60 , 61 , 66 , 75 , 78 , 83 , 85 , 86 , 94 , 102 104 ). Furthermore, two studies were performed with botulinum toxin type B ( 73 , 87 ) and two with incobotulinum toxin type A ( 76 , 88 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of BoNT/A in central PSP control has been investigated (Table 3) (66)(67)(68)(69). A prospective RCT performed on 37 patients failed to demonstrate any BoNT/A efficacy on PSP (68).…”
Section: Post-stroke Pain (Psp)mentioning
confidence: 99%