2021
DOI: 10.3390/rel12040230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Analogical Model of Cognitive Principles and Its Significance for the Dialogue between Science and Theology

Abstract: Analogical models in science enable us to understand unobservable theoretical entities. We need this basic understanding, even in the case of mental phenomena, where multiple cognitive principles are involved. In this article, we suggest an analogical model of cognition that incorporates basic insights from the philosophies of science and theology, which could serve as a point of contact for the dialogue between science and theology. For this purpose, we presuppose six stages of understanding and the existence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now we will present four such ontological levels of reality, which are highlighted in the mountain-body model of understanding (Cf. Pohar 2021). They are inextricably linked to the specific types of meaning perception and reasoning (i.e., specific a posteriori scientific methods), which investigate each of them.…”
Section: The Plurality Of Methods and The Idea Of Stratified Realitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now we will present four such ontological levels of reality, which are highlighted in the mountain-body model of understanding (Cf. Pohar 2021). They are inextricably linked to the specific types of meaning perception and reasoning (i.e., specific a posteriori scientific methods), which investigate each of them.…”
Section: The Plurality Of Methods and The Idea Of Stratified Realitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, we use the mountain-body model of understanding (Cf. Pohar 2021), which presupposes four different layers of reality and, consequently, four different types of methods, which will be explained below. However, before trying to confirm the reasonableness of the Christian worldview with the Argument from True Love, we must first show that our method of inference to the best explanation is legitimate and trustworthy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%