2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The analogical reasoning analysis of Pesantren students in geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Student motivation and interest in learning are low (psychological ontogenic obstacles) caused by inappropriate learning design (instrumental ontogenic obstacles) and student difficulties in understanding the material in the learning process ((conceptual ontogenic obstacles); 2) didactic blocks occur because the mathematics curriculum used in the pesantren is the same as the mathematics curriculum in typical high school (SMA or Madrasah Aliyah) so that it affects mathematics learning in the classroom. Based on the results of interviews with students and teachers, students felt that the mathematics taught was not related to their lives in pesantren; and 3) epistemological obstacles occur because the learning process solely depends on high school mathematics textbooks, so the mathematical context presented is not different from familiar high school students (Ramdhani & Suryadi, 2018;Ramdhani, Suryadi, & Prabawanto, 2019a, 2019bRamdhani, Suryadi, & Prabawanto, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Student motivation and interest in learning are low (psychological ontogenic obstacles) caused by inappropriate learning design (instrumental ontogenic obstacles) and student difficulties in understanding the material in the learning process ((conceptual ontogenic obstacles); 2) didactic blocks occur because the mathematics curriculum used in the pesantren is the same as the mathematics curriculum in typical high school (SMA or Madrasah Aliyah) so that it affects mathematics learning in the classroom. Based on the results of interviews with students and teachers, students felt that the mathematics taught was not related to their lives in pesantren; and 3) epistemological obstacles occur because the learning process solely depends on high school mathematics textbooks, so the mathematical context presented is not different from familiar high school students (Ramdhani & Suryadi, 2018;Ramdhani, Suryadi, & Prabawanto, 2019a, 2019bRamdhani, Suryadi, & Prabawanto, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permasalahan yang dihadapi siswa dalam bernalar analogis berdasarkan studi pendahuluan yang dilakukan pada siswa kelas X SMA antara lain: 1) 56% siswa masih mengalami kesulitan dalam melakukan penalaran analogis, terutama jika dikonversikan ke dalam konteks yang berbeda dengan ekspresi verbal; 2) siswa mengalami kesalahan dalam proses retrieval (mengingat situasi sebelumnya dalam memori atau dengan situasi baru yang analog atau sama), sehingga mereka akan mengalami kesalahan dalam proses pemetaan; 3) 66% siswa masih kesulitan memetakan domain dasar dengan domain target karena kurang memahami domain dasar; tetapi 4) jika kegiatan frontal diberikan agar unsur sumbernya jelas, maka 30% siswa akan mengalami kesulitan (Ramdhani & Suryadi, 2018). Berdasarkan hasil pengamatan penulis, hal ini juga terjadi karena proses pembelajaran matematika belum mendorong siswa untuk menggunakan keterampilan penalaran analogis, padahal proses pembelajaran dapat dikaitkan dengan proses pemahaman qiyas seperti yang telah dijelaskan sebelumnya.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…It is an important content of material on geometry (Ikhsan & Juandi, 2015). It is when students have a preliminary understanding of basic graphics points, lines and angles (Ramdhani & Suryadi, 2018). A special positional relationship based on learning, initially infiltrating students' ideas from general to special, is the key content of the school, math material material is difficult to understand (Dewi, Mediyani, Hidayat, Rohaeti, & Wijaya, 2019; T.T.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%