The Analysis of Impact and Mitigation of Landslides Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method

Andriani, A.; Adji, Bayu Martanto; Ramadhani, Sekar Hayuning Nur

doi:10.1007/978-981-16-9348-9_40

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The A'WOT, first proposed by Kurttila et al [47], is a hybrid methodology that combines the qualitative analysis derived from the SWOT matrix [48,49] with the quantitative, weighted, and consistent judgements proposed by the AHP multicriteria analysis technique [50,51]. The results obtained are measurable and allow prioritisation of the intervention factors identified in the SWOT [52].…”

Section: A'wotmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Multicriteria Analysis to Support Natural Resource Governance: The Case of Chestnut Forests

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Efficient natural resource management prevents and reduces negative impacts, such as environmental damage, misappropriation of resources, and conflicts; several strategies can be leveraged to conserve, protect, and enhance natural resources. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) is useful in providing solutions to addressing decision choice problems. In this study, the natural resource under evaluation is the chestnut forest, with the objective of valorising its supply chains. The methodology applied is A’WOT, which allows previously identified factors, using a qualitative SWOT matrix, to be ordered through an objective quantification using the AHP (analytic hierarchy process), which is a multicriteria decision support method. The survey was conducted with a group of chestnut resource (n = 20) experts. The SWOT matrix identified a total of 20 factors: 6 strengths and 6 weaknesses and 4 factors each for opportunities and threats. The results express a clear stakeholder interest, which identifies the significant role of civil society in directing management choices for the provision and enhancement of ecosystem and vocational services. This study evaluated the adaptability of decision support tools applied to a real case of forest resource management to identify and order factors useful to enhance the resource and stimulate the supply chains to achieve greater added value. In a general sense, the methodological potential emerged to replicate or improve the research in other geographical regions, whether regional or extraregional, or even on a larger scale, such as on a national level.

show abstract

Section: A'wotmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Multicriteria Analysis to Support Natural Resource Governance: The Case of Chestnut Forests

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The A'WOT, first proposed by Kurttila et al (2000), is a hybrid methodology that combines the qualitative analysis derived from the SWOT matrix (Jayaprakash and Swamy, 2023; Silva et al, 2022) with the quantitative, weighted, and consistent judgements proposed by the AHP multi-criteria analysis technique (Andriani et al, 2023;Ranji et al, 2022). The results obtained are measurable and allow prioritisation of the intervention factors identified in the SWOT (Varolgüneş et al, 2022).…”

Section: A'wotmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Multicriteria Analysis to Support Natural Resource Governance. The Case of Chestnut Forests

Bruzzese¹,

Blanc²,

Novelli³

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Efficient natural resource management prevents and reduces negative impacts, such as environmental damage, misappropriation of resources, and conflicts; several strategies can be leveraged to conserve, protect, and enhance natural resources. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is useful in providing solutions to addressing decision-choice problems. In this study, the natural resource under evaluation is the chestnut forest, with the objective of valorising its supply chains. The methodology applied is A'WOT, which allows previously identified factors through a qualitative SWOT matrix, to be ordered through an objective quantification using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), which is a multicriteria decision-support method. The survey was conducted with a group of chestnut resource (n=20) experts. The SWOT matrix identified a total of 20 factors: 6 strengths and 6 weaknesses and 4 factors each for opportunities and threats. The results express a clear stakeholder interest, which identifies the significant role of civil society in directing management choices for the provision and enhancement of ecosystem and vocational services. This study evaluated the adaptability of decision-support tools applied to a real case of forest resource management to identify and order factors useful to enhance the resource and stimulate the supply chains to achieve greater added value. In a general sense, the methodological potential emerged to replicate or improve the research in other geographical regions, whether regional or extra-regional, or even on a larger scale, such as on a national level.

show abstract

“…It is the simplest technique because no historical data is needed regarding landslides. Meanwhile, the quantitative approach considers the mathematical relationship between the occurrence of landslides and the causal factors, and this method relies on the spatial distribution of landslides and their relationship with the causal factors [19,20,21].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of factors causing landslides using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method

Andriani,

Adji,

Putri

et al. 2024

JIAE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Landslides are Indonesia's second most common disaster in the last ten years. Landslides cause losses, reaching hundreds of billions and threatening human safety. For this reason, it is necessary to take action to reduce the negative impact of landslides. Physical and non-physical mitigation can occur before, during, and after a disaster. The most essential thing in disaster mitigation is knowing the major factors that cause landslides. This research aims to analyze the major and minor factors that cause landslides using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Likert scale. Respondents in this research are experts in disasters, especially landslides—respondents from universities in Indonesia, practitioners, and people involved in disaster mitigation. Validity and reliability tests were carried out on each question used in the questionnaire. The research results show that the landslide disaster was caused by a disruption in balance that occurred due to internal and external disturbance factors. The major external factors that cause slope failures are the cutting of hills and changes in land use to built-up areas. In contrast, the major internal factors that trigger landslides are heavy rainfall and steep topographic conditions. The results of this research in the form of weight and scoring values for each factor causing landslides can be used as a reference for mapping landslide areas to identify areas with the potential for landslides.

show abstract

The Analysis of Impact and Mitigation of Landslides Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method

Cited by 7 publications

References 10 publications

A Multicriteria Analysis to Support Natural Resource Governance: The Case of Chestnut Forests

A Multicriteria Analysis to Support Natural Resource Governance: The Case of Chestnut Forests

A Multicriteria Analysis to Support Natural Resource Governance. The Case of Chestnut Forests

Assessment of factors causing landslides using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About