2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06542.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The analysis of variance in anaesthetic research: statistics, biography and history

Abstract: SummaryMultiple t-tests (or their non-parametric equivalents) are often used erroneously to compare the means of three or more groups in anaesthetic research. Methods for correcting the p value regarded as significant can be applied to take account of multiple testing, but these are somewhat arbitrary and do not avoid several unwieldy calculations. The appropriate method for most such comparisons is the 'analysis of variance' that not only economises on the number of statistical procedures, but also indicates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis was repeated without the nonprewarmed control group to investigate possible differences between the two prewarming periods according to the procedure proposed by Pandit. 13 Data are expressed as mean AE SD or median (IQR [range]), respectively. P less than 0.05 was considered significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis was repeated without the nonprewarmed control group to investigate possible differences between the two prewarming periods according to the procedure proposed by Pandit. 13 Data are expressed as mean AE SD or median (IQR [range]), respectively. P less than 0.05 was considered significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the time · pre-warming interaction a repeated measures ANOVA was performed with 'time' as repeated measure and 'pre-warming' as factor followed by the Bonferroni correction. Then, this analysis was repeated without the non-pre-warmed control group to investigate possible differences between the three pre-warming periods [6]. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Categorial variables were tested with chisquared or Fisher's exact tests when appropriate. The effect of time on mean blood pressure and heart rate within the groups was analysed using ANOVA [11]. All statistical analyses were performed with STATVIEW 5.0 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%