2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00189-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The analytic hierarchy process and multiobjective 0–1 faculty course assignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples include: creating diverse coursework groups in a university (Reeves and Hickman 1992;Weitz and Jelassi 1992); allocating students to their university accommodation (O'Brien and Mingers 1997); and forming large but balanced tutor groups in a comprehensive school (Baker and Benn 2001). Advances in heuristics have allowed increasing 11 In addition to creating student groups, the goal programming approach has also been successfully used to help construct university committees for dealing with promotions where various rules must be applied in the construction (Ceylan et al 1994), and to assign university faculty to their teaching taking into account preferences for modules and times (Schniederjans and Kim 1987;Ozdemir and Gasimov 2004;Al-Yakoob and Sherali 2006). 12 The efficiency of a number of heuristics is tested and compared in the context of creating student groups (Weitz and Lakshminarayanan 1998). use of continuous as well as binary characteristics (on which to base the allocation), and the creation of unequal groups.…”
Section: A) Students To Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include: creating diverse coursework groups in a university (Reeves and Hickman 1992;Weitz and Jelassi 1992); allocating students to their university accommodation (O'Brien and Mingers 1997); and forming large but balanced tutor groups in a comprehensive school (Baker and Benn 2001). Advances in heuristics have allowed increasing 11 In addition to creating student groups, the goal programming approach has also been successfully used to help construct university committees for dealing with promotions where various rules must be applied in the construction (Ceylan et al 1994), and to assign university faculty to their teaching taking into account preferences for modules and times (Schniederjans and Kim 1987;Ozdemir and Gasimov 2004;Al-Yakoob and Sherali 2006). 12 The efficiency of a number of heuristics is tested and compared in the context of creating student groups (Weitz and Lakshminarayanan 1998). use of continuous as well as binary characteristics (on which to base the allocation), and the creation of unequal groups.…”
Section: A) Students To Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, total deviation from the instructors' load limit is minimized. This study is an extension of the work by Özdemir and Gasimov (2004), in which a nonlinear multi-objective faculty-course assignment model is presented. In both studies, the priorities are determined by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytical Network Process (ANP), and exact solution methodologies are proposed for the solution of the models.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smith et al [9] proposed two alternative formulations, a standard Hopfield-Tank approach and the Hopfield network, for solving school timetabling problem. Ozdemir and Gasimov [10] constructed a multi-objective 0-1 nonlinear model with the consideration of participants' average preferences. Daskalaki et al [11] used NP-complete concept to solve the organizational associate constraints.…”
Section: Technology Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%