2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00075-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The anatomic features of the radial head and their implication for prosthesis design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
3
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
36
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the previous studies have measured depth of radial head on dry bone. They mainly measured depth with the of computer tomography [4,9,10]. Depth of radial head in the present study (1.74 mm) was within range of previous studies (1.5-2.4mm).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…None of the previous studies have measured depth of radial head on dry bone. They mainly measured depth with the of computer tomography [4,9,10]. Depth of radial head in the present study (1.74 mm) was within range of previous studies (1.5-2.4mm).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…[10] Swieszkowski et al found the mean depth of articular facet as 0.19 cm, and we also got similar value in our study (0.19 cm). [11] Mazzocca et al found the mean length and width of bicipital tuberosity as 2.2 and 1.5 cm, respectively. They also found that the bicipital tuberosity ridge was smooth in 6% of specimens, bifid in 6%, and the remaining 88% of specimens had a single ridge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The anatomical landmarks of the safe zone have been investigated in a few studies [16][17][18]. Further studies analyzed the morphometric aspects of the proximal radius including the diameters of radial head and neck, neck length, radial head height, articular surface depth, radial head-neck angles, and neck-shaft angle [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. These investigations were aimed at analyzing the morphometric aspects of the proximal radius to design well-performing radial head prostheses, while none of them were focused on the morphology of the safe zone in order to improve the accuracy of radial head osteosynthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%