2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-019-02404-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The anatomical relationship between the roots of erupted permanent teeth and the mandibular canal: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using CBCT images, Kosumarl et al found that mesial root of the first molar had the greatest average distance from mandibular canal, while the shortest was in distal root of second molar, both in persons with normal skeletal jaw ratio or skeletal open bite [20]. With the exception of the third molar, Pucilo et al concluded in a systematic review that distal root of the second molar was closest to the mandibular canal, which coincided with the results of our study [21]. Littner et al measured the average values of the distance from the apex of first and second molars from the canal on radiographic images of the cadaver and they were between 3.50 and 5.40 mm, and according to a study conducted by Kovisto et al on CBCT images, these average values were between 1.51 and 3.43 mm [22,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using CBCT images, Kosumarl et al found that mesial root of the first molar had the greatest average distance from mandibular canal, while the shortest was in distal root of second molar, both in persons with normal skeletal jaw ratio or skeletal open bite [20]. With the exception of the third molar, Pucilo et al concluded in a systematic review that distal root of the second molar was closest to the mandibular canal, which coincided with the results of our study [21]. Littner et al measured the average values of the distance from the apex of first and second molars from the canal on radiographic images of the cadaver and they were between 3.50 and 5.40 mm, and according to a study conducted by Kovisto et al on CBCT images, these average values were between 1.51 and 3.43 mm [22,23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Izuzimajući treći molar, Pucilo je sa saradnicima u sistematskom pregledu zaključio da je distalni koren drugog molara najbliži mandibularnom kanalu, što se podudara sa rezultatima ove studije [21].…”
Section: Diskusijaunclassified
“…The articles that were included in the IAC/IANC group were excluded from this group. The most recent, consecutive 50 articles containing “mandibular canal” but neither “inferior alveolar canal” nor “inferior alveolar nerve canal” were included (defined as the MC group) (Abd Fattah, Hariri, Nambiar, Abu Bakar, & Abdul Rahman, 2019; Al‐Shayyab, Qabba'ah, Alsoleihat, & Baqain, 2019; Alves, Dias, Mansa, & Machado, 2020; Arias et al, 2019; Bosykh, Turkina, Franco, Franco, & Makeeva, 2019; Bozkurt & Görürgöz, 2019; Burian et al, 2019; Cârstocea, Săndulescu, Hostiuc, & Rusu, 2020; M. H. Chen et al, 2019; Costa et al, 2019; Esposito et al, 2019; Felice et al, 2019; Felice, Barausse, Pistilli, Ippolito, & Esposito, 2019; Fistarol, De Stavola, Fincato, & Bressan, 2019; Freire, Nascimento, Vasconcelos, Freitas, & Haiter‐Neto, 2019; Friedrich, Matschke, & Wilczak, 2019; Iwanaga et al, 2020, 2020; Iwanaga, Wong, Kikuta, & Tubbs, 2019; Kalabalik & Aytuğar, 2019; Koç, Eroğlu, & Bilgili, 2019; Komal, Bedi, Wadhwani, Aurora, & Chauhan, 2020; K. C. Lee, Yoon, Philipone, & Peters, 2019; Liye et al, 2019; Matsuda, Yoshimura, & Sano, 2019; Matzen, Petersen, Schropp, & Wenzel, 2019; Matzen, Villefrance, Nørholt, Bak, & Wenzel, 2020; Munhoz, Arita, Nishimura, & Watanabe, 2019; Na et al, 2019; Ngeow & Chai, 2020a, 2020b; Nicol, Loncle, Pasquet, & Vacher, 2019; Okumuş & Dumlu, 2019; Oliveira et al, 2019; Ozdede, 2020; Pedersen, Matzen, Hermann, & Nørholt, 2019; Predoiu, Rusu, & Chiriţă, 2019; Puciło, Lipski, Sroczyk‐Jaszczyńska, Puciło, & Nowicka, 2020; Raju et al, 2019; Sahl, Alqahtani, Alqahtani, & Gallez, 2018; Satir, 2019; Sholapurkar & Davies, 2019; Sinha et al, 2019; Sun et al, 2019; Tereshchuk & Sukharev, 2019; Uğur Ay...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mandibular canal (MC) is an anatomical structure located in the ramus and body of the mandible 1 , which extends from the mandibular foramen to the mental foramen, and is responsible for the passage of the vasculonervous bundle, which includes a nerve, an artery, and a vein. These structures are responsible for sensations, blood innervation of mandibular teeth, interdental papilla, and periodontal and alveolar bone tissue, respectively [2][3][4] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%